Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE · CHAPTER 154— SPECIAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEDURES IN CAPITAL CASES · § 2264

§ 2264. Scope of Federal review; district court adjudications

191 words·~1 min read·/usc/title-28/section-2264

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Whenever a State prisoner under capital sentence files a petition for habeas corpus relief to which this chapter applies, the district court shall only consider a claim or claims that have been raised and decided on the merits in the State courts, unless the failure to raise the claim properly is—
(1)the result of State action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States;
(2)the result of the Supreme Court’s recognition of a new Federal right that is made retroactively applicable; or
(3)based on a factual predicate that could not have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence in time to present the claim for State or Federal post-conviction review.
(b)Following review subject to subsections (a), (d), and
(e)of section 2254, the court shall rule on the claims properly before it.
(Added Pub. L. 104–132, title I, § 107(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1223.)
Connections5 cite this · traces to 1
3 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 104–132, title I, § 107(a)
  • 110 Stat. 1223
  • section 107(c) of Pub. L. 104–132
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 2264
Scope of Federal review; district court adjudications
Fed. Reg.×5
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104–132, title I, § 107(a)
Stat.110 Stat. 1223
Pub. L.section 107(c) of Pub. L. 104–132
Cites 4Cited by 5 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.