Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE · CHAPTER 113— PROCESS · § 1692

§ 1692. Process and orders affecting property in different districts

163 words·~1 min read·/usc/title-28/section-1692

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

In proceedings in a district court where a receiver is appointed for property, real, personal, or mixed, situated in different districts, process may issue and be executed in any such district as if the property lay wholly within one district, but orders affecting the property shall be entered of record in each of such districts.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 945.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 117 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 56, 36 Stat. 1102).
Provisions of section 117 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., as to jurisdiction and control of a receiver of property in several districts are the basis of section 754 of this title.
For explanation of revision of section 117 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., and its extension to include property, not only in the same judicial circuit, but in any judicial circuit. (See reviser’s note under section 754 of this title.)
Changes were made in phraseology.
Connections1 cite this · traces to 2
4 references not yet in our index
  • June 25, 1948, ch. 646
  • 62 Stat. 945
  • Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 56
  • 36 Stat. 1102
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 1692
Process and orders affecting property in different districts
U.S.C.×1
ActJune 25, 1948, ch. 646
Stat.62 Stat. 945
ActMar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 56
Stat.36 Stat. 1102
Cites 6Cited by 1 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.