Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE · CHAPTER 85— DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION · § 1367

§ 1367. Supplemental jurisdiction

446 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-28/section-1367

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Except as provided in subsections
(b)and
(c)or as expressly provided otherwise by Federal statute, in any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction, the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. Such supplemental jurisdiction shall include claims that involve the joinder or intervention of additional parties.
(b)In any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded solely on section 1332 of this title, the district courts shall not have supplemental jurisdiction under subsection
(a)over claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule 14, 19, 20, or 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or over claims by persons proposed to be joined as plaintiffs under Rule 19 of such rules, or seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24 of such rules, when exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332.
(c)The district courts may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim under subsection
(a)if—
(1)the claim raises a novel or complex issue of State law,
(2)the claim substantially predominates over the claim or claims over which the district court has original jurisdiction,
(3)the district court has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction, or
(4)in exceptional circumstances, there are other compelling reasons for declining jurisdiction.
(d)The period of limitations for any claim asserted under subsection (a), and for any other claim in the same action that is voluntarily dismissed at the same time as or after the dismissal of the claim under subsection (a), shall be tolled while the claim is pending and for a period of 30 days after it is dismissed unless State law provides for a longer tolling period.
(e)As used in this section, the term “State” includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States.
(Added Pub. L. 101–650, title III, § 310(a), Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5113.)
Connections8 cite this · traces to 1
4 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 101–650, title III, § 310(a)
  • 104 Stat. 5113
  • Pub. L. 101–650, title III, § 310(c)
  • 104 Stat. 5114
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 1367
Supplemental jurisdiction
Fed. Reg.×6
Stat.×1
U.S.C.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 101–650, title III, § 310(a)
Stat.104 Stat. 5113
Pub. L.Pub. L. 101–650, title III, § 310(c)
Stat.104 Stat. 5114
Cites 5Cited by 8 across 3 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.