Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 28 - JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE · CHAPTER 5— DISTRICT COURTS · § 121

§ 121. South Carolina

784 words·~4 min read·/usc/title-28/section-121

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

South Carolina constitutes one judicial district comprising eleven divisions.
(1)Court for the Charleston Division shall be held at Charleston.
(2)Court for the Columbia Division shall be held at Columbia.
(3)Court for the Florence Division shall be held at Florence.
(4)Court for the Aiken Division shall be held at Aiken.
(5)Court for the Orangeburg Division shall be held at Orangeburg.
(6)Court for the Greenville Division shall be held at Greenville.
(7)Court for the Rock Hill Division shall be held at Rock Hill.
(8)Court for the Greenwood Division shall be held at Greenwood.
(9)Court for the Anderson Division shall be held at Anderson.
(10)Court for the Spartanburg Division shall be held at Spartanburg.
(11)Court for the Beaufort Division shall be held at Beaufort.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 889; Pub. L. 89–242, § 1(a), Oct. 7, 1965, 79 Stat. 951; Pub. L. 99–657, § 2, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3670; Pub. L. 102–140, title III, § 304, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 810.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 186 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 105, 36 Stat. 1123; Feb. 5, 1912, ch. 28, 37 Stat. 60; Mar. 3, 1915, ch. 100, § 5, 38 Stat. 961; Sept. 1, 1916, ch. 434, 39 Stat. 721; Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 261, 42 Stat. 1486; Jan. 30, 1925, ch. 118, 43 Stat. 800; June 26, 1926, ch. 696, §§ 1–3, 44 Stat. 773; June 20, 1936, ch. 637, §§ 1–3, 49 Stat. 1558, 1559; June 12, 1940, ch. 335, 54 Stat. 344; June 28, 1943, ch. 173, title II, § 204, 57 Stat. 244; Dec. 13, 1944, ch. 556, 58 Stat. 801).
The last sentence of section 186 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to trial of criminal cases in the division in which the offense was committed, was omitted as fully covered by Rules 18–22 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
A provision relating to the places of the clerks’ offices was omitted as covered by section 751 of this title.
The provision respecting court accommodations at Orangeburg was omitted as covered by section 142 of this title.
Changes in arrangement and phraseology were made.
Connections7 cite this · traces to 5
41 references not yet in our index
  • June 25, 1948, ch. 646
  • 62 Stat. 889
  • Pub. L. 89–242, § 1(a)
  • 79 Stat. 951
  • Pub. L. 99–657, § 2
  • 100 Stat. 3670
  • Pub. L. 102–140, title III, § 304
  • 105 Stat. 810
  • Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 105
  • 36 Stat. 1123
  • Feb. 5, 1912, ch. 28
  • 37 Stat. 60
  • Mar. 3, 1915, ch. 100, § 5
  • 38 Stat. 961
  • Sept. 1, 1916, ch. 434
  • 39 Stat. 721
  • Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 261
  • 42 Stat. 1486
  • Jan. 30, 1925, ch. 118
  • 43 Stat. 800
  • June 26, 1926, ch. 696
  • 44 Stat. 773
  • June 20, 1936, ch. 637
  • 49 Stat. 1558
  • June 12, 1940, ch. 335
  • 54 Stat. 344
  • June 28, 1943, ch. 173
  • 57 Stat. 244
  • Dec. 13, 1944, ch. 556
  • 58 Stat. 801
  • section 186 of title 28
  • Pub. L. 102–140, § 304(1)
  • Pub. L. 102–140, § 304(2)
  • Pub. L. 99–657, § 2(1)
  • Pub. L. 99–657, § 2(2)
  • Pub. L. 99–657, § 2(3)
  • Pub. L. 89–242
  • Pub. L. 99–657, § 4
  • Pub. L. 89–242, § 6
  • 79 Stat. 953
+ 1 more
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 121
South Carolina
U.S.C.×6
Stat.×1
ActJune 25, 1948, ch. 646
Stat.62 Stat. 889
Pub. L.Pub. L. 89–242, § 1(a)
Stat.79 Stat. 951
Pub. L.Pub. L. 99–657, § 2
Cites 46 · showing 10Cited by 7 across 2 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.