Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 23 - HIGHWAYS · CHAPTER 3— GENERAL PROVISIONS · § 331

§ 331. Evaluation of projects within an operational right-of-way

526 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-23/section-331

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Definitions.—
(1)Eligible project or activity.—
(A)In general.— In this section, the term “eligible project or activity” means a project or activity within an existing operational right-of-way (as defined in section 771.117(c)(22) of title 23, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations))—
(I)eligible for assistance under this title; or
(II)administered as if made available under this title;
(ii)that is—
(I)a preventive maintenance, preservation, or highway safety improvement project (as defined in section 148(a)); or
(II)a new turn lane that the State advises in writing to the Secretary would assist public safety; and
(iii)that—
(I)is classified as a categorical exclusion under section 771.117 of title 23, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations); or
(II)if the project or activity does not receive assistance described in clause
(i)would be considered a categorical exclusion if the project or activity received assistance described in clause (i).
(B)Exclusion.— The term “eligible project or activity” does not include a project to create a new travel lane.
(2)Preliminary evaluation.— The term “preliminary evaluation”, with respect to an application described in subsection (b)(1), means an evaluation that is customary or practicable for the relevant agency to complete within a 45-day period for similar applications.
(3)Relevant agency.— The term “relevant agency” means a Federal agency, other than the Federal Highway Administration, with responsibility for review of an application from a State for a permit, approval, or jurisdictional determination for an eligible project or activity.
(b)Action Required.—
(1)In general.— Subject to paragraph (2), not later than 45 days after the date of receipt of an application by a State for a permit, approval, or jurisdictional determination for an eligible project or activity, the head of the relevant agency shall—
(A)make at least a preliminary evaluation of the application; and
(B)notify the State of the results of the preliminary evaluation under subparagraph (A).
(2)Extension.— The head of the relevant agency may extend the review period under paragraph
(1)by not more than 30 days if the head of the relevant agency provides to the State written notice that includes an explanation of the need for the extension.
(3)Failure to act.— If the head of the relevant agency fails to meet a deadline under paragraph
(1)or (2), as applicable, the head of the relevant agency shall—
(A)not later than 30 days after the date of the missed deadline, submit to the State, the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a report that describes why the deadline was missed; and
(B)not later than 14 days after the date on which a report is submitted under subparagraph (A), make publicly available, including on the internet, a copy of that report.
(Added Pub. L. 117–58, div. A, title I, § 11309(a), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 535.)
Connections3 cite this · traces to 2
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 135 Stat. 535
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 331
Evaluation of projects within an operational right-of-way
Pub. L.×1
Stat. Comp.×1
Stat.×1
Stat.135 Stat. 535
Cites 3Cited by 3 across 3 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.