§ 8101. Findings
931 words·~4 min read·
/usc/title-22/section-8101A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Congress makes the following findings:
(1)The proliferation of nuclear weapons and other nuclear explosive devices poses a grave threat to the national security of the United States and its vital national interests.
(2)The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty has proven critical to limiting such proliferation.
(3)For the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty to be effective, each of the non-nuclear-weapon State Parties must conclude a comprehensive safeguards agreement with the IAEA, and such agreements must be honored and enforced.
(4)Recent events emphasize the urgency of strengthening the effectiveness and improving the efficiency of the safeguards system. This can best be accomplished by providing IAEA inspectors with more information about, and broader access to, nuclear activities within the territory of non-nuclear-weapon State Parties.
(5)The proposed scope of such expanded information and access has been negotiated by the member states of the IAEA in the form of a Model Additional Protocol to its existing safeguards agreements, and universal acceptance of Additional Protocols by non-nuclear weapons states is essential to enhancing the effectiveness of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
(6)On June 12, 1998, the United States, as a nuclear-weapon State Party, signed an Additional Protocol that is based on the Model Additional Protocol, but which also contains measures, consistent with its existing safeguards agreements with its members, that protect the right of the United States to exclude the application of IAEA safeguards to locations and activities with direct national security significance or to locations or information associated with such activities.
(7)Implementation of the Additional Protocol in the United States in a manner consistent with United States obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty may encourage other parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, especially non-nuclear-weapon State Parties, to conclude Additional Protocols and thereby strengthen the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty safeguards system and help reduce the threat of nuclear proliferation, which is of direct and substantial benefit to the United States.
(8)Implementation of the Additional Protocol by the United States is not required and is completely voluntary given its status as a nuclear-weapon State Party, but the United States has acceded to the Additional Protocol to demonstrate its commitment to the nuclear nonproliferation regime and to make United States civil nuclear activities available to the same IAEA inspections as are applied in the case of non-nuclear-weapon State Parties.
(9)In accordance with the national security exclusion contained in Article 1.b of its Additional Protocol, the United States will not allow any inspection activities, nor make any declaration of any information with respect to, locations, information, and activities of direct national security significance to the United States.
(10)Implementation of the Additional Protocol will conform to the principles set forth in the letter of April 30, 2002, from the United States Permanent Representative to the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Vienna Office of the United Nations to the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
(Pub. L. 109–401, title II, § 202, Dec. 18, 2006, 120 Stat. 2741.)
Connections2 cite this · traces to 1
Cited by 2 sections · top 1
Traces to 1 document
4 references not yet in our index
- Pub. L. 109–401, title II, § 202
- 120 Stat. 2741
- Pub. L. 109–401, title II, § 201
- Public Law 109–401
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 8101
Findings
Stat.×2
Pub. L.Pub. L. 109–401, title II, § 202
Stat.120 Stat. 2741
Pub. L.Pub. L. 109–401, title II, § 201
Pub. L.Public Law 109–401
Cites 5Cited by 2 across 1 source