Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 22 - FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE · CHAPTER 69A— CUBAN LIBERTY AND DEMOCRATIC SOLIDARITY (LIBERTAD) · SUBCHAPTER III— PROTECTION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS OF UNITED STATES NATIONALS · § 6081

§ 6081. Findings

488 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-22/section-6081

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The Congress makes the following findings:
(1)Individuals enjoy a fundamental right to own and enjoy property which is enshrined in the United States Constitution.
(2)The wrongful confiscation or taking of property belonging to United States nationals by the Cuban Government, and the subsequent exploitation of this property at the expense of the rightful owner, undermines the comity of nations, the free flow of commerce, and economic development.
(3)Since Fidel Castro seized power in Cuba in 1959—
(A)he has trampled on the fundamental rights of the Cuban people; and
(B)through his personal despotism, he has confiscated the property of—
(i)millions of his own citizens;
(ii)thousands of United States nationals; and
(iii)thousands more Cubans who claimed asylum in the United States as refugees because of persecution and later became naturalized citizens of the United States.
(4)It is in the interest of the Cuban people that the Cuban Government respect equally the property rights of Cuban nationals and nationals of other countries.
(5)The Cuban Government is offering foreign investors the opportunity to purchase an equity interest in, manage, or enter into joint ventures using property and assets some of which were confiscated from United States nationals.
(6)This “trafficking” in confiscated property provides badly needed financial benefit, including hard currency, oil, and productive investment and expertise, to the current Cuban Government and thus undermines the foreign policy of the United States—
(A)to bring democratic institutions to Cuba through the pressure of a general economic embargo at a time when the Castro regime has proven to be vulnerable to international economic pressure; and
(B)to protect the claims of United States nationals who had property wrongfully confiscated by the Cuban Government.
(7)The United States Department of State has notified other governments that the transfer to third parties of properties confiscated by the Cuban Government “would complicate any attempt to return them to their original owners”.
(8)The international judicial system, as currently structured, lacks fully effective remedies for the wrongful confiscation of property and for unjust enrichment from the use of wrongfully confiscated property by governments and private entities at the expense of the rightful owners of the property.
(9)International law recognizes that a nation has the ability to provide for rules of law with respect to conduct outside its territory that has or is intended to have substantial effect within its territory.
(10)The United States Government has an obligation to its citizens to provide protection against wrongful confiscations by foreign nations and their citizens, including the provision of private remedies.
(11)To deter trafficking in wrongfully confiscated property, United States nationals who were the victims of these confiscations should be endowed with a judicial remedy in the courts of the United States that would deny traffickers any profits from economically exploiting Castro’s wrongful seizures.
(Pub. L. 104–114, title III, § 301, Mar. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 814.)
Connections1 cite this
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 104–114, title III, § 301
  • 110 Stat. 814
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 6081
Findings
Stat.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104–114, title III, § 301
Stat.110 Stat. 814
Cites 2Cited by 1 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.