Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 2 - THE CONGRESS · CHAPTER 24— CONGRESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY · SUBCHAPTER IV— ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL DISPUTE-RESOLUTION PROCEDURES · § 1409

§ 1409. Judicial review of regulations

210 words·~1 min read·/usc/title-2/section-1409

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

In any proceeding brought under section 1407 or 1408 of this title in which the application of a regulation issued under this chapter is at issue, the court may review the validity of the regulation in accordance with the provisions of subparagraphs
(A)through
(D)of section 706(2) of title 5, except that with respect to regulations approved by a joint resolution under section 1384(c) of this title, only the provisions of section 706(2)(B) of title 5 shall apply. If the court determines that the regulation is invalid, the court shall apply, to the extent necessary and appropriate, the most relevant substantive executive agency regulation promulgated to implement the statutory provisions with respect to which the invalid regulation was issued. Except as provided in this section, the validity of regulations issued under this chapter is not subject to judicial review.
(Pub. L. 104–1, title IV, § 409, Jan. 23, 1995, 109 Stat. 37.)
Connections7 cite this · traces to 3
4 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 104–1, title IV, § 409
  • 109 Stat. 37
  • Pub. L. 104–1
  • 109 Stat. 3
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 1409
Judicial review of regulations
Bills×6
Stat. Comp.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104–1, title IV, § 409
Stat.109 Stat. 37
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104–1
Stat.109 Stat. 3
Cites 7Cited by 7 across 2 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.