§ 1673f. Treatment of difference between deposit of estimated antidumping duty and final assessed duty under antidumping duty order
503 words·~2 min read·
/usc/title-19/section-1673fA research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)Deposit of estimated antidumping duty under section 1673b(d)(1)(B) of this title If the amount of a cash deposit, or the amount of any bond or other security, required as security for an estimated antidumping duty under section 1673b(d)(1)(B) of this title is different from the amount of the antidumping duty determined under an antidumping duty order published under section 1673e of this title, then the difference for entries of merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption before notice of the affirmative determination of the Commission under section 1673d(b) of this title is published shall be—
(1)disregarded, to the extent that the cash deposit, bond, or other security is lower than the duty under the order, or
(2)refunded or released, to the extent that the cash deposit, bond, or other security is higher than the duty under the order.
(b)Deposit of estimated antidumping duty under section 1673e(a)(3) of this title If the amount of an estimated antidumping duty deposited under section 1673e(a)(3) of this title is different from the amount of the antidumping duty determined under an antidumping duty order published under section 1673e of this title, then the difference for entries of merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption after notice of the affirmative determination of the Commission under section 1673d(b) of this title is published shall be—
(1)collected, to the extent that the deposit under section 1673e(a)(3) of this title is lower than the duty determined under the order, or
(2)refunded, to the extent that the deposit under section 1673e(a)(3) of this title is higher than the duty determined under the order,
together with interest as provided by section 1677g of this title.
(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title VII, § 737, as added Pub. L. 96–39, title I, § 101, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 173; amended Pub. L. 103–465, title II, § 219(c)(10), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4857; Pub. L. 104–295, § 40, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3541.)
Connections4 cite this · traces to 5
Cited by 4 sections
statutes-at-large
statute-compilations
12 references not yet in our index
- June 17, 1930, ch. 497
- Pub. L. 96–39, title I, § 101
- 93 Stat. 173
- Pub. L. 103–465, title II, § 219(c)(10)
- 108 Stat. 4857
- Pub. L. 104–295, § 40
- 110 Stat. 3541
- Pub. L. 104–295, § 40(1)
- Pub. L. 104–295, § 40(2)
- Pub. L. 104–295, § 40(3)
- Pub. L. 103–465
- section 291 of Pub. L. 103–465
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 1673f
Treatment of difference between deposit of estimated antidumping duty and final assessed duty under antidumping duty order
Stat.×2
Bills×1
Stat. Comp.×1
ActJune 17, 1930, ch. 497
Pub. L.Pub. L. 96–39, title I, § 101
Stat.93 Stat. 173
Pub. L.Pub. L. 103–465, title II, § 219(c)(10)
Stat.108 Stat. 4857
Cites 17 · showing 10Cited by 4 across 3 sources