Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE · CHAPTER 1— GENERAL PROVISIONS · § 3

§ 3. Accessory after the fact

462 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-18/section-3

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 99–646, § 43, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3601; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, § 3502, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4921; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §§ 330011(h), 330016(2)(A), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2145, 2148.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 551 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, § 333, 35 Stat. 1152).
The first paragraph is new. It is based upon authority of Skelly v. United States (C. C. A. Okl. 1935, 76 F. 2d 483, certiorari denied, 1935, 55 S. Ct. 914, 295 U.S. 757, 79 L. Ed. 1699), where the court defined an accessory after the fact as—
one who knowing a felony to have been committed by another, receives, relieves, comforts, or assists the felon in order to hinder the felon’s apprehension, trial, or punishment—
and cited Jones’ Blackstone, books 3 and 4, page 2204; U.S. v. Hartwell (Fed. Cas. No. 15,318); Albritton v. State (32 Fla. 358, 13 So. 955); State v. Davis (14 R. I. 281); Schleeter v. Commonwealth (218 Ky. 72, 290 S. W. 1075). (See also State v. Potter, 1942, 221 N. C. 153, 19 S. E. 2d 257; Hunter v. State, 1935, 128 Tex. Cr. R. 191, 79 S. W. 2d 855; State v. Wells, 1940, 195 La. 754, 197 So. 419.)
The second paragraph is from section 551 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Here only slight changes were made in phraseology.
Connections13 cite this · traces to 1
16 references not yet in our index
  • June 25, 1948, ch. 645
  • 62 Stat. 684
  • Pub. L. 99–646, § 43
  • 100 Stat. 3601
  • Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, § 3502
  • 104 Stat. 4921
  • Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII
  • 108 Stat. 2145
  • Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, § 333
  • 35 Stat. 1152
  • Pub. L. 103–322, § 330016(2)(A)
  • Pub. L. 103–322, § 330011(h)
  • Pub. L. 101–647, § 3502
  • Pub. L. 101–647
  • Pub. L. 99–646
  • Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330011(h)
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 3
Accessory after the fact
Fed. Reg.×6
IRM×5
Stat.×1
U.S.C.×1
ActJune 25, 1948, ch. 645
Stat.62 Stat. 684
Pub. L.Pub. L. 99–646, § 43
Stat.100 Stat. 3601
Pub. L.Pub. L. 101–647, title XXXV, § 3502
Cites 17 · showing 6Cited by 13 across 4 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.