Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 17 - COPYRIGHTS · CHAPTER 2— COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP AND TRANSFER · § 204

§ 204. Execution of transfers of copyright ownership

306 words·~1 min read·/usc/title-17/section-204

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)A transfer of copyright ownership, other than by operation of law, is not valid unless an instrument of conveyance, or a note or memorandum of the transfer, is in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed or such owner’s duly authorized agent.
(b)A certificate of acknowledgement is not required for the validity of a transfer, but is prima facie evidence of the execution of the transfer if—
(1)in the case of a transfer executed in the United States, the certificate is issued by a person authorized to administer oaths within the United States; or
(2)in the case of a transfer executed in a foreign country, the certificate is issued by a diplomatic or consular officer of the United States, or by a person authorized to administer oaths whose authority is proved by a certificate of such an officer.
(Pub. L. 94–553, title I, § 101, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2570.)
Historical and Revision Notes
house report no. 94–1476
Section 204 is a somewhat broadened and liberalized counterpart of sections 28 and 29 of the present statute [sections 28 and 29 of former title 17]. Under subsection (a), a transfer of copyright ownership (other than one brought about by operation of law) is valid only if there exists an instrument of conveyance, or alternatively a “note or memorandum of the transfer,” which is in writing and signed by the copyright owner “or such owner’s duly authorized agent.” Subsection
(b)makes clear that a notarial or consular acknowledgment is not essential to the validity of any transfer, whether executed in the United States or abroad. However, the subsection would liberalize the conditions under which certificates of acknowledgment of documents executed abroad are to be accorded prima facie weight, and would give the same weight to domestic acknowledgments under appropriate circumstances.
Connections5 cite this
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 94–553, title I, § 101
  • 90 Stat. 2570
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 204
Execution of transfers of copyright ownership
Fed. Reg.×4
Stat.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 94–553, title I, § 101
Stat.90 Stat. 2570
Cites 2Cited by 5 across 2 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.