Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 16 - CONSERVATION · CHAPTER 89— PACIFIC WHITING · § 7003

§ 7003. United States representation on the scientific review group

170 words·~1 min read·/usc/title-16/section-7003

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In general The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall appoint no more than 2 scientific experts to serve on the scientific review group. An individual shall not be eligible to serve on the scientific review group while serving on the joint technical committee.
(b)Term An individual appointed under subsection
(a)shall be appointed for a term of not to exceed 4 years, but shall be eligible for reappointment. An individual appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of a term of office of that individual’s predecessor shall be appointed to serve for the remainder of that term.
(c)Joint appointments In addition to individuals appointed under subsection (a), the Secretary, jointly with the Government of Canada, may appoint to the scientific review group, from a list of names provided by the advisory panel—
(1)up to 2 independent members of the scientific review group; and
(2)2 public advisors.
(Pub. L. 109–479, title VI, § 604, Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3645.)
Connections3 cite this
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 109–479, title VI, § 604
  • 120 Stat. 3645
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 7003
United States representation on the scientific review group
U.S.C.×2
Stat.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 109–479, title VI, § 604
Stat.120 Stat. 3645
Cites 2Cited by 3 across 2 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.