Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 16 - CONSERVATION · CHAPTER 84— HEALTHY FOREST RESTORATION · SUBCHAPTER IV— INSECT INFESTATIONS AND RELATED DISEASES · § 6554

§ 6554. Applied silvicultural assessments

490 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-16/section-6554

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Assessment efforts For information gathering and research purposes, the Secretary may conduct applied silvicultural assessments on Federal land that the Secretary determines is at risk of infestation by, or is infested with, forest-damaging insects.
(b)Limitations
(1)Exclusion of certain areas Subsection
(a)does not apply to—
(A)a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System;
(B)any Federal land on which, by Act of Congress or Presidential proclamation, the removal of vegetation is restricted or prohibited;
(C)a congressionally-designated wilderness study area; or
(D)an area in which activities under subsection
(a)would be inconsistent with the applicable land and resource management plan.
(2)Certain treatment prohibited Nothing in subsection
(a)authorizes the application of insecticides in municipal watersheds or associated riparian areas.
(3)Peer review
(A)In general Before being carried out, each applied silvicultural assessment under this subchapter shall be peer reviewed by scientific experts selected by the Secretary, which shall include non-Federal experts.
(B)Existing peer review processes The Secretary may use existing peer review processes to the extent the processes comply with subparagraph (A).
(c)Public notice and comment
(1)Public notice The Secretary shall provide notice of each applied silvicultural assessment proposed to be carried out under this section.
(2)Public comment The Secretary shall provide an opportunity for public comment before carrying out an applied silviculture assessment under this section.
(d)Categorical exclusion
(1)In general Applied silvicultural assessment and research treatments carried out under this section on not more than 1,000 acres for an assessment or treatment may be categorically excluded from documentation in an environmental impact statement and environmental assessment under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
(2)Administration Applied silvicultural assessments and research treatments categorically excluded under paragraph (1)—
(A)shall not be carried out in an area that is adjacent to another area that is categorically excluded under paragraph
(1)that is being treated with similar methods; and
(B)shall be subject to the extraordinary circumstances procedures established by the Secretary pursuant to section 1508.4 of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations.
(3)Maximum categorical exclusion The total number of acres categorically excluded under paragraph
(1)shall not exceed 250,000 acres.
(4)No additional findings required In accordance with paragraph (1), the Secretary shall not be required to make any findings as to whether an applied silvicultural assessment project, either individually or cumulatively, has a significant effect on the environment.
(Pub. L. 108–148, title IV, § 404, Dec. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 1910.)
Connections9 cite this · traces to 1
4 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 108–148, title IV, § 404
  • 117 Stat. 1910
  • Pub. L. 91–190
  • 83 Stat. 852
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 6554
Applied silvicultural assessments
Fed. Reg.×4
Bills×2
Stat. Comp.×1
Stat.×1
U.S.C.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 108–148, title IV, § 404
Stat.117 Stat. 1910
Pub. L.Pub. L. 91–190
Stat.83 Stat. 852
Cites 5Cited by 9 across 5 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.