Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 15 - COMMERCE AND TRADE · CHAPTER 111— WEATHER RESEARCH AND FORECASTING INNOVATION · SUBCHAPTER IV— IMPROVING FEDERAL PRECIPITATION INFORMATION · § 8561

§ 8561. Study on precipitation estimation

438 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-15/section-8561

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In general Not later than 90 days after December 16, 2022, the Administrator, in consultation with other Federal agencies as appropriate, shall seek to enter an agreement with the National Academies—
(1)to conduct a study on the state of practice and research needs for precipitation estimation, including probable maximum precipitation estimation; and
(2)to submit, not later than 24 months after the date on which such agreement is finalized, to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and make publicly available on a website, a report on the results of the study under paragraph (1).
(b)Study The report under subsection
(a)shall include the following:
(1)An examination of the current state of practice for precipitation estimation at scales appropriate for decisionmaker needs, and rationale for further evolution of this field.
(2)An evaluation of best practices for precipitation estimation that are based on the best-available science, include considerations of non-stationarity, and can be utilized by the user community.
(3)A framework for—
(A)the development of a National Guidance Document for estimating extreme precipitation in future conditions; and
(B)evaluation of the strengths and challenges of the full spectrum of approaches, including for probable maximum precipitation studies.
(4)A description of existing research needs in the field of precipitation estimation in order to modernize current methodologies and consider non-stationarity.
(5)A description of in-situ, airborne, and space-based observation requirements, that could enhance precipitation estimation and development of models, including an examination of the use of geographic information systems and geospatial technology for integration, analysis, and visualization of precipitation data.
(6)A recommended plan for a Federal research and development program, including specifications for costs, timeframes, and responsible agencies for addressing identified research needs.
(7)An analysis of the respective roles in precipitation estimation of various Federal agencies, academia, State, tribal, territorial, and local governments, and other public and private stakeholders.
(8)Recommendations for data management to promote long-term needs such as enabling retrospective analyses and data discoverability, interoperability, and reuse.
(9)Recommendations for how data and services from the entire enterprise can be best leveraged by the Federal Government.
(10)A description of non-Federal precipitation data, its accessibility by the Federal Government, and ways for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to improve or expand such datasets.
(c)Authorization of appropriations There is authorized $1,500,000 to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to carry out this study.
Connections7 cite this · traces to 2
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 136 Stat. 2313
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 8561
Study on precipitation estimation
U.S.C.×3
Bills×1
Pub. L.×1
Stat. Comp.×1
Stat.×1
Stat.136 Stat. 2313
Cites 3Cited by 7 across 5 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.