Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 15 - COMMERCE AND TRADE · CHAPTER 14A— AID TO SMALL BUSINESS · § 657q

§ 657q. Consolidation of contract requirements

1,019 words·~5 min read·/usc/title-15/section-657q

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Definitions In this section—
(1)the term “Chief Acquisition Officer” means the employee of a Federal agency appointed or designated as the Chief Acquisition Officer for the Federal agency under section 1702(a) of title 41;
(2)the term “consolidation of contract requirements”, with respect to contract requirements of a Federal agency, means a use of a solicitation to obtain offers for a single contract or a multiple award contract—
(A)to satisfy 2 or more requirements of the Federal agency for goods or services that have been provided to or performed for the Federal agency under 2 or more separate contracts lower in cost than the total cost of the contract for which the offers are solicited; or
(B)to satisfy requirements of the Federal agency for construction projects to be performed at 2 or more discrete sites; and
(3)the term “senior procurement executive” means an official designated under section 1702(c) of title 41 as the senior procurement executive for a Federal agency.
(b)Policy The head of each Federal agency shall ensure that the decisions made by the Federal agency regarding consolidation of contract requirements of the Federal agency are made with a view to providing small business concerns with appropriate opportunities to participate as prime contractors and subcontractors in the procurements of the Federal agency.
(c)Limitation on use of acquisition strategies involving consolidation
(1)In general The head of a Federal agency may not carry out an acquisition strategy that includes a consolidation of contract requirements of the Federal agency with a total value of more than $2,000,000, unless the senior procurement executive or Chief Acquisition Officer for the Federal agency, before carrying out the acquisition strategy—
(A)conducts market research;
(B)identifies any alternative contracting approaches that would involve a lesser degree of consolidation of contract requirements;
(C)makes a written determination that the consolidation of contract requirements is necessary and justified;
(D)identifies any negative impact by the acquisition strategy on contracting with small business concerns; and
(E)ensures that steps will be taken to include small business concerns in the acquisition strategy.
(2)Determination that consolidation is necessary and justified
(A)In general A senior procurement executive or Chief Acquisition Officer may determine that an acquisition strategy involving a consolidation of contract requirements is necessary and justified for the purposes of paragraph (1)(C) if the benefits of the acquisition strategy substantially exceed the benefits of each of the possible alternative contracting approaches identified under paragraph (1)(B).
(B)Savings in administrative or personnel costs For purposes of subparagraph (A), savings in administrative or personnel costs alone do not constitute a sufficient justification for a consolidation of contract requirements in a procurement unless the expected total amount of the cost savings, as determined by the senior procurement executive or Chief Acquisition Officer, is expected to be substantial in relation to the total cost of the procurement.
(C)Notice Not later than 7 days after making a determination that an acquisition strategy involving a consolidation of contract requirements is necessary and justified under subparagraph (A), the senior procurement executive or Chief Acquisition Officer shall publish a notice on a public website that such determination has been made. Any solicitation for a procurement related to the acquisition strategy may not be published earlier than 7 days after such notice is published. Along with the publication of the solicitation, the senior procurement executive or Chief Acquisition Officer shall publish a justification for the determination, which shall include the information in subparagraphs
(A)through
(E)of paragraph (1).
(3)Benefits to be considered The benefits considered for the purposes of paragraphs
(1)and
(2)may include cost and, regardless of whether quantifiable in dollar amounts—
(A)quality;
(B)acquisition cycle;
(C)terms and conditions; and
(D)any other benefit.
(Pub. L. 85–536, § 2[44], as added Pub. L. 111–240, title I, § 1313(a)(2), Sept. 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 2538; amended Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title XVI, § 1671(a), (b), (c)(2), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2084, 2085; Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title VIII, § 822(b), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3436; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 863(b), (c), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 926, 927.)
Connections83 cite this · traces to 6
Cited by 83 sections · top 46
statutes-at-large
bill
13 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 85–536, § 2[44]
  • Pub. L. 111–240, title I, § 1313(a)(2)
  • 124 Stat. 2538
  • Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title XVI, § 1671(a)
  • 126 Stat. 2084
  • 128 Stat. 3436
  • 129 Stat. 926
  • Pub. L. 85–536
  • 41 U.S.C. 414(a)
  • 41 U.S.C. 414(c)
  • Pub. L. 112–239, § 1671(a)
  • Pub. L. 112–239, § 1671(b)
  • Pub. L. 112–239, § 1671(c)(2)
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 657q
Consolidation of contract requirements
Fed. Reg.×44
Bills×20
Stat. Comp.×6
Stat.×5
U.S.C.×5
Pub. L.×3
Pub. L.Pub. L. 85–536, § 2[44]
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111–240, title I, § 1313(a)(2)
Stat.124 Stat. 2538
Pub. L.Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title XVI, § 1671(a)
Stat.126 Stat. 2084
Cites 19 · showing 11Cited by 83 across 6 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.