Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 15 - COMMERCE AND TRADE · CHAPTER 22— TRADEMARKS · SUBCHAPTER I— THE PRINCIPAL REGISTER · § 1067

§ 1067. Interference, opposition, and proceedings for concurrent use registration or for cancellation; notice; Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

1,124 words·~5 min read·/usc/title-15/section-1067

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In every case of interference, opposition to registration, application to register as a lawful concurrent user, or application to cancel the registration of a mark, the Director shall give notice to all parties and shall direct a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to determine and decide the respective rights of registration.
(b)The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board shall include the Director, Deputy 1 Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office 2 the Commissioner for Patents, the Commissioner for Trademarks, and administrative trademark judges who are appointed by the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Director.
(c)Authority of the Secretary.— The Secretary of Commerce may, in his or her discretion, deem the appointment of an administrative trademark judge who, before August 12, 2008, held office pursuant to an appointment by the Director to take effect on the date on which the Director initially appointed the administrative trademark judge.
(d)Defense to Challenge of Appointment.— It shall be a defense to a challenge to the appointment of an administrative trademark judge on the basis of the judge’s having been originally appointed by the Director that the administrative trademark judge so appointed was acting as a de facto officer.
(July 5, 1946, ch. 540, title I, § 17, 60 Stat. 434; Pub. L. 85–609, § 1(a), Aug. 8, 1958, 72 Stat. 540; Pub. L. 93–596, § 1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 96–455, § 1, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2024; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4716], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–580; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13203(a)(1), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1902; Pub. L. 110–313, § 1(b), Aug. 12, 2008, 122 Stat. 3014.)
Connections24 cite this · traces to 3
Cited by 24 sections · top 18
statutes-at-large
32 references not yet in our index
  • 1
  • 2
  • July 5, 1946, ch. 540
  • 60 Stat. 434
  • Pub. L. 85–609, § 1(a)
  • 72 Stat. 540
  • Pub. L. 93–596, § 1
  • 88 Stat. 1949
  • Pub. L. 96–455, § 1
  • 94 Stat. 2024
  • Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4716]
  • 113 Stat. 1536
  • Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, § 13203(a)(1)
  • 116 Stat. 1902
  • Pub. L. 110–313, § 1(b)
  • 122 Stat. 3014
  • Act Feb. 20, 1905, ch. 592, § 7
  • 33 Stat. 726
  • Pub. L. 110–313, § 1(b)(1)
  • Pub. L. 110–313, § 1(b)(2)
  • Pub. L. 107–273
  • Pub. L. 106–113
  • Pub. L. 96–455
  • Pub. L. 93–596
  • Pub. L. 85–609
  • Pub. L. 96–455, § 2
  • section 17 of the Act of July 5, 1946
  • section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596
  • Pub. L. 85–609, § 3
  • 72 Stat. 541
  • Pub. L. 85–609, § 2
  • 64 Stat. 1263
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 1067
Interference, opposition, and proceedings for concurrent use registration or for cancellation; notice; Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
U.S.C.×9
Stat.×7
Fed. Reg.×6
Stat. Comp.×2
Cite1
Cite2
ActJuly 5, 1946, ch. 540
Stat.60 Stat. 434
Pub. L.Pub. L. 85–609, § 1(a)
Cites 35 · showing 8Cited by 24 across 4 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.