Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 10 - ARMED FORCES · CHAPTER 47A— MILITARY COMMISSIONS · SUBCHAPTER VII— POST-TRIAL PROCEDURE AND REVIEW OF MILITARY COMMISSIONS · § 950g

§ 950g. Review by United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; writ of certiorari to Supreme Court

545 words·~2 min read·/usc/title-10/section-950g

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Exclusive Appellate Jurisdiction.— Except as provided in subsection (b), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction to determine the validity of a final judgment rendered by a military commission (as approved by the convening authority and, where applicable, as affirmed or set aside as incorrect in law by the United States Court of Military Commission Review) under this chapter.
(b)Exhaustion of Other Appeals.— The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit may not review a final judgment described in subsection
(a)until all other appeals under this chapter have been waived or exhausted.
(c)Time for Seeking Review.— A petition for review by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit must be filed in the Court of Appeals—
(1)not later than 20 days after the date on which written notice of the final decision of the United States Court of Military Commission Review is served on the parties; or
(2)if the accused submits, in the form prescribed by section 950c of this title, a written notice waiving the right of the accused to review by the United States Court of Military Commission Review, not later than 20 days after the date on which such notice is submitted.
(d)Scope and Nature of Review.— The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit may act under this section only with respect to the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority and as affirmed or set aside as incorrect in law by the United States Court of Military Commission Review, and shall take action only with respect to matters of law, including the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.
(e)Review by Supreme Court.— The Supreme Court may review by writ of certiorari pursuant to section 1254 of title 28 the final judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit under this section.
(Added Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, § 1802, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2603; amended Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, § 1034(d), Dec. 31, 2011, 125 Stat. 1573.)
Connectionstraces to 2
11 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, § 1802
  • 123 Stat. 2603
  • Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, § 1034(d)
  • 125 Stat. 1573
  • Pub. L. 109–366, § 3(a)(1)
  • 120 Stat. 2622
  • Pub. L. 111–84
  • Pub. L. 112–81, § 1034(d)(1)
  • Pub. L. 112–81, § 1034(d)(2)(A)
  • Pub. L. 112–81, § 1034(d)(2)(B)
  • Pub. L. 112–81, § 1034(d)(2)(C)
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 950g
Review by United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; writ of certiorari to Supreme Court
Pub. L.Pub. L. 111–84, div. A, title XVIII, § 1802
Stat.123 Stat. 2603
Pub. L.Pub. L. 112–81, div. A, title X, § 1034(d)
Stat.125 Stat. 1573
Pub. L.Pub. L. 109–366, § 3(a)(1)
Cites 13 · showing 7Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.