Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 10 - ARMED FORCES · CHAPTER 2011— SEPARATION OF OFFICERS FOR SUBSTANDARD PERFORMANCE OF DUTY OR FOR CERTAIN OTHER REASONS · § 20506

§ 20506. Officers eligible to serve on retention boards

176 words·~1 min read·/usc/title-10/section-20506

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In General.— The provisions of section 1187 of this title apply to the membership of boards convened under this chapter in the same manner as to the membership of boards convened under chapter 60 of this title.
(b)Retired Air Force Officers.—
(1)Authority.— In applying subsection
(b)of section 1187 of this title to a board convened under this chapter, the Secretary of the Air Force may appoint retired officers of the Air Force, in addition to retired officers of the Space Force, to complete the membership of the board.
(2)Limitation.— A retired officer of the Air Force may be appointed to a board under paragraph
(1)only if the officer served in a space-related career field of the Air Force for sufficient time such that the Secretary of the Air Force determines that the retired Air Force officer has adequate knowledge concerning the standards of performance and conduct required of an officer of the Space Force.
(Added Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XVII, § 1719, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 662.)
Connections4 cite this · traces to 2
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 137 Stat. 662
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 20506
Officers eligible to serve on retention boards
Pub. L.×1
Stat. Comp.×1
Stat.×1
U.S.C.×1
Stat.137 Stat. 662
Cites 3Cited by 4 across 4 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.