Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · U.S. Code · Title 10 - ARMED FORCES · CHAPTER 76— MISSING PERSONS · § 1508

§ 1508. Judicial review

203 words·~1 min read·/usc/title-10/section-1508

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Right of Review.— A person who is the primary next of kin (or the previously designated person) of a person who is the subject of a finding described in subsection
(b)may obtain judicial review in a United States district court of that finding, but only on the basis of a claim that there is information that could affect the status of the missing person’s case that was not adequately considered during the administrative review process under this chapter. Any such review shall be as provided in section 706 of title 5.
(b)Findings for Which Judicial Review May Be Sought.— Subsection
(a)applies to the following findings:
(1)A finding by a board appointed under section 1504 or 1505 of this title that a missing person is dead.
(2)A finding by a board appointed under section 1509 of this title that confirms that a missing person formerly declared dead is in fact dead.
(c)Subsequent Review.— Appeals from a decision of the district court shall be taken to the appropriate United States court of appeals and to the Supreme Court as provided by law.
(Added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, § 569(b)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 348.)
Connectionstraces to 2
2 references not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, § 569(b)(1)
  • 110 Stat. 348
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 1508
Judicial review
Pub. L.Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title V, § 569(b)(1)
Stat.110 Stat. 348
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.