Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 40 — Protection of Environment · Part 52 · § 52.2591

§ 52.2591. Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements.

520 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t40/s§ 52.2591·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Approval. In a December 12, 2007 submittal, supplemented on January 24, 2011, March 28, 2011, July 2, 2015, and August 8, 2016, Wisconsin certified that the State has satisfied the infrastructure SIP requirements of section 110(a)(2)(A) through (C), (D)(ii),
(E)through (H), and
(J)through
(M)for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
(b)Approval. In a December 12, 2007 submittal, supplemented on January 24, 2011, March 28, 2011, July 2, 2015, and August 8, 2016, Wisconsin certified that the State has satisfied the infrastructure SIP requirements of section 110(a)(2)(A) through (C), (D)(ii),
(E)through (H), and
(J)through
(M)for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.
(c)Approval. In a January 24, 2011, submittal, supplemented on March 28, 2011, June 29, 2012, July 2, 2015, and August 8, 2016, Wisconsin certified that the State has satisfied the infrastructure SIP requirements of section 110(a)(2)(A) through (H), and
(J)through
(M)for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. We are not finalizing action on (D)(i)(I) and will address these requirements in a separate action.
(d)Approval. In a July 26, 2012, submittal, supplemented July 2, 2015, and August 8, 2016, Wisconsin certified that the State has satisfied the infrastructure SIP requirements of section 110(a)(2)(A) through (H), and
(J)through
(M)for the 2008 lead
(Pb)NAAQS.
(e)Approval and Disapproval. In a June 20, 2013, submittal with a January 28, 2015, clarification, supplemented July 2, 2015, and August 8, 2016, Wisconsin certified that the state has satisfied the infrastructure SIP requirements of section 110(a)(2)(A) through (H), and
(J)through
(M)for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. For 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), we are approving prong one and disapproving prong two.
(f)Approval. In a June 20, 2013, submission with a January 28, 2015, clarification, supplemented July 2, 2015, and August 8, 2016, Wisconsin certified that the state has satisfied the infrastructure SIP requirements of section 110(a)(2)(A) through (H), and
(J)through
(M)for the 2010 nitrogen dioxide
(NO2)NAAQS.
(g)Approval. In a June 20, 2013, submission with a January 28, 2015, clarification, supplemented July 2, 2015, and August 8, 2016, Wisconsin certified that the state has satisfied the infrastructure SIP requirements of section 110(a)(2)(A) through (H), and
(J)through
(M)for the 2010 sulfur dioxide
(SO2)NAAQS. We are not taking action on the transport provisions in section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), and will address these requirements in a separate action.
(h)Approval. In a July 13, 2015, submission, supplemented August 8, 2016, and August 3, 2022, WDNR certified that the State has satisfied the infrastructure SIP requirements of section 110(a)(2)(A) through (H), and
(J)through
(M)for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS.
(i)Approval—In September 14, 2018, and August 3, 2022, submissions, WDNR certified that the state has satisfied the infrastructure SIP requirements of section 110(a)(2)(A) through (H), and
(J)through
(M)for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. For section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), prong 1 is approved and prong 2 is disapproved. (j)-(l) [Reserved] [82 FR 9518, Feb. 7, 2017, as amended at 81 FR 95047, Dec. 27, 2016; 84 FR 53063, Oct. 4, 2019; 88 FR 9384, Feb. 13, 2023; 88 FR 47377, July 24, 2023; 89 FR 70505, Aug. 30, 2024]
Connections2 cite this
Cited by 2 sections · top 1
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 52.2591
Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements.
Fed. Reg.×2
Cites 0Cited by 2 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.