Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 39 — Postal Service · Part 962 · § 962.5

§ 962.5. (Rule 5) Scope of hearing; evidentiary standard.

150 words·~1 min read·/us/cfr/t39/s§ 962.5·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)A hearing under this part will be conducted by the Presiding Officer to determine:
(1)Whether the Respondent is liable under 31 U.S.C. 3802; and
(2)The amount of any civil penalty or assessment to be imposed if the Respondent is found liable under 31 U.S.C. 3802.
(b)The Postal Service must prove its case against a Respondent by a preponderance of the evidence.
(c)The parties may offer at a hearing on the merits relevant evidence that is admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence, subject, however, to the sound discretion of the Presiding Officer in supervising the extent and manner of presentation of the evidence. In general, admissibility will hinge on relevancy and materiality. Relevant evidence, however, may be excluded if its probative value is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 962.5
(Rule 5) Scope of hearing; evidentiary standard.
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.