Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 39 — Postal Service · Part 501 · § 501.7

§ 501.7. Postage Evidencing System requirements.

492 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t39/s§ 501.7·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)A Postage Evidencing System submitted to the Postal Service for approval must meet the requirements of the Intelligent Mail Indicia Performance Criteria (IMIPC) published by Commercial Payment. Copies of the current IMIPC may be requested via mail to the address in § 501.2(f).
(b)The provider must affix to all meters a cautionary message providing the meter user with basic reminders on leasing and meter movement.
(1)The cautionary message must be placed on all meters in a conspicuous and highly visible location. PROPERTY OF \[NAME OF PROVIDER\] as well as the provider's toll-free number must be emphasized by capitalized bold type and preferably printed in red. The minimum width of the message should be 3.25 inches, and the minimum height should be 1.75 inches. The message should read as follows: RENTED POSTAGE METER-NOT FOR SALE PROPERTY OF \[NAME OF PROVIDER\]
(800)\#\#\#-\#\#\#\# Use of this meter is permissible only under U.S. Postal Service authorization. Call \[Name of Provider\] at
(800)\#\#\#-\#\#\#\# to relocate/return this meter. WARNING! METER TAMPERING IS A FEDERAL OFFENSE. IF YOU SUSPECT METER TAMPERING, CALL POSTAL INSPECTORS AT
(800)372-8347 REWARD UP TO \$50,000 for information leading to the conviction of any person who misuses postage meters resulting in the Postal Service not receiving correct postage payments.
(2)Exceptions to the formatting of the required message are determined on a case-by-case basis. Any deviation from standardized meter message requirements must be approved in writing by the Postal Service.
(c)The provider must ensure that any matter printed by a Postage Evidencing System, whether within the boundaries of the indicia or outside the clear zone as defined in DMM 604.4.0 and the Intelligent Mail Indicia Performance Criteria (IMI-PC), is:
(1)Consistent with the Postal Service's intent to maintain neutrality on religious, social, political, legal, moral, or other public issues;
(2)Is not obscene, deceptive, or defamatory of any person, entity, or group, and does not advocate unlawful action;
(3)Does not emulate any form of valid postage, government, or other official indicia, or payment of postage; and
(4)Does not harm the public image, reputation, or good will of the Postal Service and is not otherwise derogatory or detrimental to the interests of the Postal Service.
(d)Providers must also ensure that customers acknowledge, agree, and warrant in writing that:
(1)The customer bears full responsibility and liability for obtaining authorization to reproduce and otherwise use the matter as proposed (including, without limitation, any trademarks, slogans, likenesses or copyrighted material contained in the image);
(2)The customer in fact has the legal authority to reproduce and otherwise use the matter as proposed; and
(3)The customer understands that images or other matter is not provided, approved, or endorsed in any way by the Postal Service. \[71 FR 65733, Nov. 9, 2006, as amended at 78 FR 44439, July 24, 2013; 82 FR 60118, Dec. 19, 2017; 85 FR 21777, Apr. 20, 2020; 85 FR 78235, Dec. 4, 2020\]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.