Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 39 — Postal Service · Part 3040 · § 3040.221

§ 3040.221. Additional supporting justification for negotiated service agreements.

428 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t39/s§ 3040.221·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Each request shall also include the items specified in paragraphs
(b)through
(j)of this section.
(b)A copy of the negotiated service agreement.
(c)The planned effective date(s) of the planned rates.
(d)The identity of a responsible Postal Service official who will be available to provide prompt responses to requests for clarification from the Commission.
(e)A statement identifying all parties to the agreement and a description clearly explaining the operative components of the agreement.
(f)Details regarding the expected improvements in the net financial position or operations of the Postal Service (39 U.S.C. 3622(c)(10)(A)(i) and (ii)). The projection of the change in net financial position as a result of the agreement shall be based on accepted analytical principles. The projection of the change in net financial position as a result of the agreement shall include for each year of the agreement:
(1)The estimated mailer-specific costs, volumes, and revenues of the Postal Service absent the implementation of the negotiated service agreement;
(2)The estimated mailer-specific costs, volumes, and revenues of the Postal Service which result from implementation of the negotiated service agreement;
(3)An analysis of the effects of the negotiated service agreement on the contribution to institutional costs from mailers not party to the agreement;
(4)If mailer-specific costs are not available, the source and derivation of the costs that are used shall be provided, together with a discussion of the currency and reliability of those costs and their suitability as a proxy for the mailer-specific costs; and
(5)If the Postal Service believes the Commission's accepted analytical principles are not the most accurate and reliable methodology available:
(i)An explanation of the basis for that belief; and
(ii)A projection of the change in net financial position resulting from the agreement made using the Postal Service's alternative methodology.
(g)An identification of each component of the agreement expected to enhance the performance of mail preparation, processing, transportation, or other functions in each year of the agreement, and a discussion of the nature and expected impact of each such enhancement.
(h)Details regarding any and all actions (performed or to be performed) to assure that the agreement will not result in unreasonable harm to the marketplace (39 U.S.C. 3622(c)(10)(B)).
(i)A discussion in regard to how functionally similar negotiated service agreements will be made available on public and reasonable terms to similarly situated mailers.
(j)Such other information as the Postal Service believes will assist the Commission in issuing a timely determination of whether the requested changes are consistent with applicable statutory policies.
Connections3 cite this · traces to 1
Cited by 3 sections · top 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 3040.221
Additional supporting justification for negotiated service agreements.
Fed. Reg.×3
Cites 1Cited by 3 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.