§ 351.3. Controversy and further proceedings.
355 words·~2 min read·
/us/cfr/t37/s§ 351.3·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)Declaration of controversy. If a settlement has not been reached within the voluntary negotiation period, the Copyright Royalty Judges will issue an order declaring that further proceedings are necessary. The procedures set forth at §§ 351.5, et seq., for formal hearings will apply, unless the abbreviated procedures set forth in paragraphs
(b)and
(c)of this section are invoked by the Copyright Royalty Judges.
(b)Small claims in distribution proceedings---(1) General. If, in a distribution proceeding, the contested amount of a claim is \$10,000 or less, the Copyright Royalty Judges shall decide the controversy on the basis of the filing of the written direct statement by each participant (or participant group filing a joint petition), the response by any opposing participant, and one optional reply by a participant who has filed a written direct statement.
(2)Bad faith inflation of claim. If the Copyright Royalty Judges determine that a participant asserts in bad faith an amount in controversy in excess of \$10,000 for the purpose of avoiding a determination under the procedure set forth in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the Copyright Royalty Judges shall impose a fine on that participant in an amount not to exceed the difference between the actual amount distributed and the amount asserted by the participant.
(c)Paper proceedings---(1) Standard. The procedure under this paragraph
(c)will be applied in cases in which there is no genuine issue of material fact, there is no need for evidentiary hearings, and all participants in the proceeding agree in writing to the procedure. In the absence of an agreement in writing among all participants, this procedure may be applied by the Copyright Royalty Judges either on the motion of a party or by the Copyright Royalty Judges sua sponte.
(2)Procedure. Paper proceedings will be decided on the basis of the filing of the written direct statement by the participant (or participant group filing a joint petition), the response by any opposing participant, and one optional reply by a participant who has filed a written direct statement. \[70 FR 30905, May 31, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 53328, Sept. 11, 2006\]