Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 33 — Navigation and Navigable Waters · Part 154 · § 154.2010

§ 154.2010. Qualifications for acceptance as a certifying entity.

205 words·~1 min read·/us/cfr/t33/s§ 154.2010·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

To qualify for acceptance as a vapor control system
(VCS)certifying entity, the entity must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commandant that it possesses the following minimum qualifications:
(a)The ability to review and evaluate design drawings and failure analyses for compliance to this subpart;
(b)The knowledge of the applicable regulations of this subpart, including the standards incorporated by reference;
(c)The ability to monitor and evaluate test procedures and results for compliance with the operational requirements of this subpart;
(d)The ability to perform inspections and observe tests of bulk liquid cargo-handling systems;
(e)The applicant must not be controlled by an owner or operator of a vessel or facility engaged in controlling vapor emissions;
(f)The applicant must not be dependent upon Coast Guard acceptance under this section to remain in business; and
(g)The person in charge of VCS certification must be a licensed professional engineer in a U.S. State or territory. A person in charge of VCS certification who is not a licensed professional engineer on August 15, 2013 must obtain that license from a U.S. State or territory by August 15, 2014. \[USCG-1999-5150, 78 FR 42618, July 16, 2013, as amended by 80 FR 7540, Feb. 11, 2015\]
Connections1 cite this
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 154.2010
Qualifications for acceptance as a certifying entity.
Fed. Reg.×1
Cites 0Cited by 1 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.