§ 794.114. The enterprise must be "independently owned and controlled."
359 words·~2 min read·
/us/cfr/t29/s§ 794.114·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Another requirement for exemption under section 7(b)(3) is that the enterprise must be "independently owned and controlled". Since this requirement is in the conjunctive, it must be established that the enterprise which is engaged in the wholesale or bulk distribution of petroleum products is both independently owned and independently controlled. (Wirtz v. Lunsford, 404 F. 2d 693 (C.A. 6).) At the hearing before the Senate Labor Subcommittee, when the amendment was proposed which eventually was incorporated in the Act as section 13(b)(10) by the 1961 amendments (later repealed by the 1966 amendments to the Act and replaced by section 7(b)(3)), a spokesman for proponents of the amendment made the following statement, which bears on this requirement for exemption:
The designation "independent" as applied to an oil jobber means that he owns his own office, bulk storage, and delivery facilities; pays his own personnel, and in all respects conducts his business as any other independent businessman. It also means that the jobber is not a subsidiary of nor controlled by any so-called major oil company, although the jobber may sell the branded products of such a company. Some jobbers own service stations which they lease to independent dealers and a small percentage of jobbers may operate one or more service stations with their own salaried personnel.
(Senate Hearings on the Amendments to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 87th Cong., first session, p. 411.) It appears, therefore, that the purpose of the requirement limiting the exemption to the enterprises which are "independently owned and controlled," is to confine the exemption to those petroleum jobbers who own their own facilities and equipment and who are not subsidiaries nor controlled by any producer, refinery, terminal supplier or so-called major oil company. (See Wirtz v.
Lunsford, cited above.) The fact that the petroleum jobber sells a branded product of a major oil company will not, of itself, affect the status of his enterprise as one which is "independently owned and controlled". So also the fact that the jobber owns gasoline service stations, which he leases or which he operates himself, will not affect the status of his enterprise as being "independently owned and controlled".
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
- 404 F.2d 693
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 794.114
The enterprise must be "independently owned and controlled."
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources