§ 780.902. Legislative history of exemption.
250 words·~1 min read·
/us/cfr/t29/s§ 780.902·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
Since the language of section 13(b)(16) and its predecessor, section 13(a)(22) is identical, the legislative history of former section 13(a)(22) still retains its pertinency and vitality. The former section 13(a)(22) was added to the Act by the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1961. The original provision in the House-passed bill was in the form of an amendment to the Act's definition of agriculture. It would have altered the effect of holdings of the courts that operations such as those described in the amendment are not within the agriculture exemption provided by section 13(a)(6) when performed by employees of persons other than the farmer.
(Chapman v. Durkin, 214 F. 2d 360, certiorari denied 348 U.S. 897; Fort Mason Fruit Co. v. Durkin, 214 F. 2d 363, certiorari denied, 348 U.S. 897.) The amendment was offered to exempt operations which, in the sponsor's view, were meant to be exempt under the original Act. (See 107 Cong. Rec. (daily ed.) p. 4523.) The Conference Committee, in changing the provision to make it a separate exemption made it clear that is was "not intended by the committee of conference to change by this exemption (for the described transportation employees) \* \* \* the application of the Act to any other employees.
Nor is it intended that there be any implication of disagreement by the conference committee with the principles and tests governing the application of the present agricultural exemption as enunciated by the courts." (H. Rept. No. 327, 87th Cong., first session, p. 18.)
Connections3 off-index
3 references not yet in our index
- 214 F.2d 360
- 348 U.S. 897
- 214 F.2d 363
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 780.902
Legislative history of exemption.
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources