§ 778.414. "Approval" of contracts under section 7(f).
556 words·~3 min read·
/us/cfr/t29/s§ 778.414·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)There is no requirement that a contract, to qualify under section 7(f), must be approved by the Secretary of Labor or the Administrator. The question of whether a contract which purports to qualify an employee for exemption under section 7(f) meets the requirements is a matter for determination by the courts. This determination will in all cases depend not merely on the wording of the contract but upon the actual practice of the parties thereunder. It will turn on the question of whether the duties of the employee in fact necessitate irregular hours, whether the rate specified in the contract is a "regular rate"---that is, whether it was designed to be actually operative in determining the employee's compensation---whether the contract was entered into in good faith, whether the guaranty of pay is in fact based on the regular and overtime rates specified in the contract. While the Administrator does have the authority to issue an advisory opinion as to whether or not a pay arrangement accords with the requirements of section 7(f) he can do so only if he has knowledge of these facts.
(b)As a guide to employers, it may be helpful to describe a fact situation in which the making of a guaranteed salary contract would be appropriate and to set forth the terms of a contract which would comply, in the circumstances described, with the provisions of section 7(f). Example:An employee is employed as an insurance claims adjuster; because of the fact that he must visit claimants and witnesses at their convenience, it is impossible for him or his employer to control the hours which he must work to perform his duties. During the past 6 months his weekly hours of work have varied from a low of 30 hours to a high of 58 hours. His average workweek for the period was 48 hours. In about 80 percent of the workweeks he worked less than 52 hours. It is expected that his hours of work will continue to follow this pattern. The parties agree upon a regular rate of \$5 per hour. In order to provide for the employee the security of a regular weekly income the parties further agree to enter into a contract which provides a weekly guaranty of pay. If the applicable maximum hours standard is 40 hours, guaranty of pay for a workweek somewhere between 48 hours (his average week) and 52 would be reasonable. In the circumstances described the following contract would be appropriate. The X Company hereby agrees to employ John Doe as a claims adjuster at a regular hourly rate of pay of \$5 per hour for the first 40 hours in any workweek and at the rate of \$7.50 per hour for all hours in excess of 40 in any workweek, with a guarantee that John Doe will receive, in any week in which he performs any work for the company, the sum of \$275 as total compensation, for all work performed up to and including 50 hours in such workweek.
(c)The situation described in paragraph
(b)of this section is merely an example and nothing herein is intended to imply that contracts which differ from the example will not meet the requirements of section 7(f). \[33 FR 986, Jan. 26, 1968, as amended at 46 FR 7318, Jan. 23, 1981\]
Connections1 cite this
Cited by 1 section
register
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 778.414
"Approval" of contracts under section 7(f).
Fed. Reg.×1
Cites 0Cited by 1 across 1 source