§ 1911.15. Nature of hearing.
394 words·~2 min read·
/us/cfr/t29/s§ 1911.15·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)(1) The legislative history of section 6 indicates that Congress intended informal rather than formal rulemaking procedures to apply. See the Conference Report, H. Rept. No. 91-1765, 91st Cong., second sess., 34 (1970). The informality of the proceedings is also suggested by the fact that section 6(b) permits the making of a decision on the basis of written comments alone (unless an objection to a rule is made and a hearing is requested), the use of advisory committees, and the inherent legislative nature of the tasks involved. For these reasons, the proceedings pursuant to § 1911.11 shall be informal.
(2)Section 6(b)(3) provides an opportunity for a hearing on objections to proposed rulemaking, and section 6(f) provides in connection with the judicial review of standards, that determinations of the Secretary shall be conclusive if supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. Although these sections are not read as requiring a rulemaking proceeding within the meaning of the last sentence of 5 U.S.C. 553(c) requiring the application of the formal requirements of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557, they do suggest a congressional expectation that the rulemaking would be on the basis of a record to which a substantial evidence test, where pertinent, may be applied in the event an informal hearing is held.
(3)The oral hearing shall be legislative in type. However, fairness may require an opportunity for cross-examination on crucial issues. The presiding officer is empowered to permit cross- examination under such circumstances. The essential intent is to provide an opportunity for effective oral presentation by interested persons which can be carried out with expedition and in the absence of rigid procedures which might unduly impede or protract the rulemaking process.
(b)Although any hearing shall be informal and legislative in type, this part is intended to provide more than the bare essentials of informal rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553. The additional requirements are the following:
(1)The presiding officer shall be a hearing examiner appointed under 5 U.S.C. 3105.
(2)The presiding officer shall provide an opportunity for cross-examination on crucial issues.
(3)The hearing shall be reported verbatim, and a transcript shall be available to any interested person on such terms as the presiding officer may provide. \[37 FR 8664, Apr. 29, 1972, as amended at 37 FR 12231, June 21, 1972; 90 FR 27999, July 1, 2025\]
Connections31 cite this · traces to 3
Cited by 31 sections · top 19
register
- Rules and RegulationsNotice of informal public hearing
- NoticesProposed rule
- Proposed RulesProposed rule; notice of hearing
- NoticesFinal rule
- NoticesNotice of limited reopening of comment period; notice of informal hearing
- Proposed RulesNotice of availability
- NoticesProposed rule; request for comments and scheduling of informal public hearings
- NoticesFinal rule
- Proposed RulesProposed rule; notice of informal hearing
- Proposed RulesProposed rule; notice of hearing
- Proposed RulesProposed rule; notice of informal public hearing
- NoticesProposed rule; notice of informal hearing
- Proposed RulesProposed rule; procedures for informal public hearing; rescheduling of informal public hearing; additional information and clarifications
- NoticesProposed rule; request for comments and scheduling of informal public hearings
- NoticesProposed rule; request for comments
- Proposed RulesProposed rule; notice of informal public hearings
- Rules and RegulationsProposed rule; notice of hearing
- NoticesNotice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); extension of comment period; notice of informal hearing
- Proposed RulesNotice of hearing; extension of comment period; reopening of the period to file notices of intention to appear at an informal public hearing; additional issues for comment
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 3Cited by 31 across 1 source