§ 18.609. Impeachment by evidence of conviction of crime.
253 words·~1 min read·
/us/cfr/t29/s§ 18.609·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)General rule. For the purpose of attacking the credibility of a witness, evidence that the witness has been convicted of a crime shall be admitted if the crime was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year under the law under which the witness was convicted, or involved dishonesty or false statement, regardless of the punishment.
(b)Time limit. Evidence of a conviction under this rule is not admissible if a period of more than ten years has elapsed since the date of the conviction or of the release of the witness from the confinement imposed for that conviction, whichever is the later date.
(c)Effect of pardon, annulment, or certificate of rehabilitation. Evidence of a conviction is not admissible under this rule if:
(1)The conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, certificate of rehabilitation, or other equivalent procedure based on a finding of the rehabilitation of the person convicted, and that person has not been convicted of a subsequent crime which was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of one year, or
(2)The conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, or other equivalent procedure based on a finding of innocence.
(d)Juvenile adjudications. Evidence of juvenile adjudications is not admissible under this rule.
(e)Pendency of appeal. The pendency of an appeal therefrom does not render evidence of a conviction inadmissible. Evidence of the pendency of an appeal is admissible. \[55 FR 13219, Apr. 9, 1990; 55 FR 14033, Apr. 13, 1990\]