Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 28 — Judicial Administration · Part 32 · § 32.53

§ 32.53. Review.

434 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t28/s§ 32.53·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Upon the filing of the approval (under subpart E of this part) of a claim, the Director shall review the same.
(b)The Director may review---
(1)Any claim denial made under subpart E of this part; and
(2)Any claim approval made under the Act, at 34 U.S.C. 10286 or Public Law 107-37.
(c)Unless the Director judges that it would be unnecessary, the PSOB Office shall serve notice upon the claimant (and upon any other claimant who may have filed a claim with respect to the same public safety officer) of the initiation of a review under paragraph
(a)or
(b)of this section. Unless the Director judges that it would be unnecessary, such notice shall---
(1)Indicate the principal factual findings or legal conclusions at issue; and
(2)Offer a reasonable opportunity for filing of evidence or legal arguments.
(d)The Director may reconsider a claim under subparts B or C of this part that has been denied in a final agency determination if---
(1)The public safety officer was a WTC responder;
(2)The claim was based on the allegation that---
(i)The WTC responder sustained an injury that was the direct and proximate cause of his death or of his permanent and total disability; and
(ii)The WTC responder's injury was sustained in the course of performance of line of duty activity or a line of duty action that exposed him to airborne toxins, other hazards, or other adverse conditions resulting from the September 11, 2001, attacks;
(3)The sole ground of the denial was that the claim did not establish that---
(i)The WTC responder sustained an injury in the course of performance of line of duty activity or a line of duty action; or
(ii)The injury allegedly sustained by the WTC responder was the direct and proximate cause of his death or permanent and total disability;
(4)The alleged injury on which the claim was based is a WTC-related health condition; and
(5)The claimant files with the PSOB Office a motion for such reconsideration before the earlier of two year---
(i)The date on which the WTC-related physical health condition, if any, is determined by the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund, for the WTC responder, to meet the definition at section 104.2(i) of this title (as in effect on January 17, 2017); or
(ii)The date on which the WTC-related health condition, if any, is certified, for the WTC responder, (as applicable) 42 U.S.C. 300mm-22(b)(1)(B)(ii) or 42 U.S.C. 300mm-22(b)(2)(A)(ii). \[71 FR 46037, Aug. 10, 2006, as amended at 83 FR 22387, May 15, 2018\]
Connections1 cite this · traces to 2
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 107-37
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 32.53
Review.
Fed. Reg.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 107-37
Cites 3Cited by 1 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.