Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 28 — Judicial Administration · Part 24 · § 24.105

§ 24.105. Eligibility of applicants.

213 words·~1 min read·/us/cfr/t28/s§ 24.105·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)To be eligible for an award of attorney fees and other expenses under the Act, the applicant must be a prevailing party in the adversary adjudication for which it seeks an award. The term "party" is defined in 5 U.S.C. 551(3). The applicant must show that it meets all conditions of eligibility set out in this subpart and in subpart B.
(b)The types of eligible applicants are as follows:
(1)An individual with a net worth of not more than \$1 million;
(2)The sole owner of an unincorporated business who has a net worth of not more than \$5 million and not more than 500 employees;
(3)A charitable or other tax-exempt organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)) with not more than 500 employees;
(4)A cooperative association as defined in section 15(a) of the Agricultural Marketing Act (12 U.S.C. 1141j(a)) with not more than 500 employees; and
(5)Any other partnership, corporation, association, or public or private organization with a net worth of not more than \$5 million and not more than 500 employees.
(c)For the purpose of eligibility, the net worth and number of employees of an applicant shall be determined as of the date the adversary adjudication was initiated.
Connectionstraces to 3
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 24.105
Eligibility of applicants.
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.