Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 28 — Judicial Administration · Part 16 · § 16.88

§ 16.88. Exemption of Antitrust Division Systems---limited access.

544 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t28/s§ 16.88·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)The following system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a (c)(3), (d), (e)(4)
(G)and (H), and (f):
(1)Antitrust Caseload Evaluation System (ACES)---Monthly Report (JUSTICE/ATR-006). These exemptions apply only to the extent that information in this system is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a (k)(2).
(b)Exemption from the particular subsections are justified for the following reasons:
(1)From subsection (c)(3) because information in this system is maintained in aid of ongoing antitrust enforcement investigations and proceedings. The release of the accounting of disclosures made under subsection
(b)of the Act would permit the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal or civil violation to determine whether he is the subject of an investigation. Disclosure of the accounting would therefore present a serious impediment to antitrust law enforcement efforts.
(2)From subsection
(d)because access to the information retrievable from this system and compiled for law enforcement purposes could result in the premature disclosure of the identity of the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal or civil violation and information concerning the nature of that investigation. This information could enable the subject to avoid detection or apprehension. This would present a serious impediment to effective law enforcement since the subject could hinder or prevent the successful completion of the investigation. Further, confidential business and financial information, the identities of confidential sources of information, third party privacy information, and statutorily confidential information such as grand jury information must be protected from disclosure.
(3)From subsections (e)(4)(G) and (H), and
(f)because this system is exempt from the individual access provisions of subsection (d).
(c)The following system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a (c)(3), (d), (e)(4)(G) and (H), and (f):
(1)Freedom of Information/Privacy---Requester/Subject Index File (JUSTICE/ATR-008). These exemptions apply to the extent that information in this system is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a (k)(2).
(d)Because this system contains Department of Justice civil and criminal law enforcement, investigatory records, exemptions from the particular subsections are justified for the following reasons:
(1)From subsection (c)(3) because the release of the accounting of disclosures made under subsection
(b)of the Act would permit the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal or civil violation to determine whether he is the subject of an investigation. Disclosure of accounting would therefore present a serious impediment to antitrust law enforcement efforts.
(2)From subsection
(d)because access to information in this system could result in the premature disclosure of the identity of the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal or civil violation and information concerning the nature of the investigation. This information could enable the subject to avoid detection or apprehension. This would present a serious impendiment to effective law enforcement since the subject could hinder or prevent the successful completion of the investigation. Further, confidential business and financial information, the identities of confidential sources of information, third party privacy information, and statutorily confidential information such as grand jury information must be protected from disclosure.
(3)From subsections (e)(4)(G) and (H), and
(f)because this system is exempt from the individual access provisions of subsection (d). \[Order No. 2-86, 51 FR 884, Jan. 9, 1986\]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 16.88
Exemption of Antitrust Division Systems---limited access.
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.