Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 28 — Judicial Administration · Part 13 · § 13.6

§ 13.6. Criteria for reward.

167 words·~1 min read·/us/cfr/t28/s§ 13.6·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Information provided by any person to the United States for a reward under the Atomic Weapons and Special Nuclear Materials Rewards Act must be original, and must concern the unlawful:
(1)Introduction, manufacture or acquisition, or
(2)Attempted introduction, manufacture or acquisition of, or
(3)Export or attempt to export, or
(4)Conspiracy to introduce, manufacture, acquire or export special nuclear material or atomic weapons, or
(5)Loss, diversion or disposal or special nuclear material or atomic weapons.
(b)The amount of the reward shall depend on:
(1)The amount of the material recovered or potentially recoverable, and the role the information played in the recovery, and
(2)The danger the material posed or poses to the common defense and security or public health and welfare, and
(3)The difficulty in ascertaining the information submitted to claim the reward, and the quality of the information, and
(4)Any other considerations which the Attorney General or the intra-departmental committee deems necessary or helpful to the individual determination.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.