Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 23 — Highways · Part 420 — Planning and Research Program Administration · § 420.107

§ 420.107. What is the minimum required expenditure of State planning and research funds for research development and technology transfer?

418 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t23/s§ 420.107·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)A State DOT must expend no less than 25 percent of its annual SPR funds on RD activities relating to highway, public transportation, and intermodal transportation systems in accordance with the provisions of 23 U.S.C. 505(b), unless a State DOT certifies, and the FHWA accepts the State DOT's certification, that total expenditures by the State DOT during the fiscal year for transportation planning under 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135 will exceed 75 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal year.
(b)Prior to submitting a request for an exception to the 25 percent requirement, the State DOT must ensure that:
(1)The additional planning activities are essential, and there are no other reasonable options available for funding these planning activities (including the use of NHS, STP, MG, or FTA State planning and research funds (49 U.S.C. 5313(b)) or by deferment of lower priority planning activities);
(2)The planning activities have a higher priority than RD activities in the overall needs of the State DOT for a given fiscal year; and
(3)The total level of effort by the State DOT in RD (using both Federal and State funds) is adequate.
(c)If the State DOT chooses to pursue an exception, it must send the request, along with supporting justification, to the FHWA Division Administrator for action by the FHWA Associate Administrator for Research, Development, and Technology. The Associate Administrator's decision will be based upon the following considerations:
(1)Whether the State DOT has a process for identifying RD needs and for implementing a viable RD program.
(2)Whether the State DOT is contributing to cooperative RD programs or activities, such as the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, the Transportation Research Board, and transportation pooled fund studies.
(3)Whether the State DOT is using SPR funds for technology transfer and for transit or intermodal research and development to help meet the 25 percent minimum requirement.
(4)Whether the State DOT can demonstrate that it will meet the requirement or substantially increase its RD expenditures over a multi-year period, if an exception is granted for the fiscal year.
(5)Whether Federal funds needed for planning exceed the 75 percent limit for the fiscal year and whether any unused planning funds are available from previous fiscal years.
(d)If the FHWA Associate Administrator for Research, Development, and Technology approves the State DOT's request for an exception, the exception is valid only for that fiscal year's funds. A new request must be submitted and approved for subsequent fiscal year funds.
Connectionstraces to 3
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 420.107
What is the minimum required expenditure of State planning and research funds for research development and technology transfer?
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.