Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 22 — Foreign Relations · Part 172 — Service of Process; Production or Disclosure of Official Information in Response to Court Orders, Subpoenas, Notices of Depositions, Requests for Admissions, Interrogatories, or Similar Requests or Demands in Connection with Federal or State Litigation; Expert Testimony · § 172.8

§ 172.8. Considerations in determining whether the Department will comply with a demand or request.

263 words·~1 min read·/us/cfr/t22/s§ 172.8·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In deciding whether to comply with a demand or request, Department officials and attorneys shall consider, among others:
(1)Whether such compliance would be unduly burdensome or otherwise inappropriate under the applicable rules of discovery or the rules of procedure governing the case or matter in which the demand arose;
(2)Whether compliance is appropriate under the relevant substantive law concerning privilege or disclosure of information;
(3)The public interest;
(4)The need to conserve the time of Department employees for the conduct of official business;
(5)The need to avoid spending the time and money of the United States for private purposes;
(6)The need to maintain impartiality between private litigants in cases where a substantial government interest is not implicated;
(7)Whether compliance would have an adverse effect on performance by the Department of its mission and duties; and
(8)The need to avoid involving the Department in controversial issues not related to its mission.
(b)Among those demands and requests in response to which compliance will not ordinarily be authorized are those with respect to which, inter alia, any of the following factors exist:
(1)Compliance would violate a statute or a rule of procedure;
(2)Compliance would violate a specific regulation or executive order;
(3)Compliance would reveal information properly classified in the interest of national security;
(4)Compliance would reveal confidential commercial or financial information or trade secrets without the owner's consent;
(5)Compliance would reveal the internal deliberative processes of the Executive Branch; or
(6)Compliance would potentially impede or prejudice an on-going law enforcement investigation.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.