Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 21 — Food and Drugs · Part 170 — Food Additives · § 170.6

§ 170.6. Opinion letters on food additive status.

499 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t21/s§ 170.6

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Over the years the Food and Drug Administration has given informal written opinions to inquiries as to the safety of articles intended for use as components of, or in contact with, food. Prior to the enactment of the Food Additives Amendment of 1958 (Pub. L. 85-929; Sept. 6, 1958), these opinions were given pursuant to section 402(a)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which reads in part: “A food shall be deemed to be adulterated if it bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health”.
(b)Since enactment of the Food Additives Amendment, the Food and Drug Administration has advised such inquirers that an article:
(1)Is a food additive within the meaning of section 201(s) of the act; or
(2)Is generally recognized as safe (GRAS); or
(3)Has prior sanction or approval under that amendment; or
(4)Is not a food additive under the conditions of intended use.
(c)In the interest of the public health, such articles which have been considered in the past by the Food and Drug Administration to be safe under the provisions of section 402(a)(1), or to be generally recognized as safe for their intended use, or to have prior sanction or approval, or not to be food additives under the conditions of intended use, must be reexamined in the light of current scientific information and current principles for evaluating the safety of food additives if their use is to be continued.
(d)Because of the time span involved, copies of many of the letters in which the Food and Drug Administration has expressed an informal opinion concerning the status of such articles may no longer be in the file of the Food and Drug Administration. In the absence of information concerning the names and uses made of all the articles referred to in such letters, their safety of use cannot be reexamined. For this reason all food additive status opinions of the kind described in paragraph
(c)of this section given by the Food and Drug Administration are hereby revoked.
(e)The prior opinions of the kind described in paragraph
(c)of this section will be replaced by qualified and current opinions if the recipient of each such letter forwards a copy of each to the Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, along with a copy of his letter of inquiry, on or before July 23, 1970.
(f)This section does not apply to food additive status opinion letters pertaining to articles that were considered by the Food and Drug Administration to be food additives nor to articles included in regulations in parts 170 through 189 of this chapter if the articles are used in accordance with the requirements of such regulations. [42 FR 14483, Mar. 15, 1977, as amended at 54 FR 24896, June 12, 1989; 81 FR 49896, July 29, 2016]
Connections1 cite this
Cited by 1 section
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 85-929
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 170.6
Opinion letters on food additive status.
Fed. Reg.×1
Pub. L.Pub. L. 85-929
Cites 1Cited by 1 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.