Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 21 — Food and Drugs · Part 1107 — Exemption Requests and Substantial Equivalence Reports · § 1107.50

§ 1107.50. Rescission of order.

468 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t21/s§ 1107.50·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Grounds for rescinding a substantially equivalent order. FDA may rescind a substantially equivalent order allowing a new tobacco product to be marketed if FDA determines that:
(1)The tobacco product for which the order has been issued:
(i)Does not have the same characteristics as the predicate tobacco product; or
(ii)Has different characteristics and there is insufficient information demonstrating that it is not appropriate to require a premarket tobacco product application under section 910(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act because the product does not raise different questions of public health; or
(2)The SE Report (including any submitted amendments) contains an untrue statement of material fact; or
(3)Concerning an SE Report that compared the new tobacco product to a tobacco product that FDA previously found substantially equivalent,
(i)The predicate tobacco product relied on in the SE Report has been found ineligible because its SE Report (including any amendments) contains an untrue statement of material fact; or
(ii)A predicate tobacco product on which any of the previous substantial equivalence determinations was based, going back to the original predicate tobacco product, has been found ineligible because its SE Report (including any amendments) contains an untrue statement of material fact; or
(4)FDA or the applicant has removed from the market, due to a health or safety concern related to the tobacco product:
(i)The predicate tobacco product on which the substantial equivalence determination is based; or
(ii)A predicate tobacco product on which any of the previous substantial equivalence determinations is based, going back to the original predicate tobacco product, if the substantial equivalence SE Report compared the new tobacco product to a tobacco product that FDA previously found substantially equivalent.
(b)Opportunity for a hearing.
(1)Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2) and
(3)of this section, FDA will rescind an order only after notice and opportunity for a hearing under part 16 of this chapter.
(2)FDA may rescind a substantially equivalent order prior to notice and opportunity for a hearing under part 16 of this chapter if it finds that there is a reasonable probability that continued marketing of the tobacco product presents a serious risk to public health. In that case, FDA will provide the manufacturer an opportunity for a hearing as soon as possible after the rescission.
(3)FDA may rescind a substantially equivalent order without notice and opportunity for a hearing under part 16 of this chapter if the applicant has notified the Agency of a mistake in the application, FDA has determined that the mistake is part of the underlying scientific determination of the order which makes the order invalid, and the applicant has agreed that FDA can rescind the order without providing notice and opportunity for a hearing under part 16 of this chapter.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.