Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 21 — Food and Drugs · Part 1 — General Enforcement Regulations · § 1.623

§ 1.623. What reports and notifications must a recognized accreditation body submit to FDA?

455 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t21/s§ 1.623

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Reporting results of assessments of accredited third-party certification body performance. A recognized accreditation body must submit to FDA electronically, in English, a report of the results of any assessment conducted under § 1.621, no later than 45 days after completing such assessment. The report must include an up-to-date list of any audit agents used by the accredited third-party certification body to conduct food safety audits under this subpart.
(b)Reporting results of recognized accreditation body self-assessments. A recognized accreditation body must submit to FDA electronically, in English:
(1)A report of the results of an annual self-assessment required under § 1.622, no later than 45 days after completing such self-assessment; and
(2)For a recognized accreditation body subject to § 1.664(g)(1), a report of such self-assessment to FDA within 60 days of the third-party certification body's withdrawal. A recognized accreditation body may use a report prepared for conformance to ISO/IEC 17011:2004, supplemented as necessary, in meeting the requirements this section.
(c)Immediate notification to FDA. A recognized accreditation body must notify FDA electronically, in English, immediately upon:
(1)Granting (including expanding the scope of) accreditation to a third-party certification body under this subpart, and include:
(i)The name, address, telephone number, and email address of the accredited third-party certification body;
(ii)The name of one or more officers of the accredited third-party certification body;
(iii)A list of the accredited third-party certification body's audit agents; and
(iv)The scope of accreditation, the date on which it was granted, and its expiration date.
(2)Withdrawing, suspending, or reducing the scope of an accreditation under this subpart, and include:
(i)The basis for such action; and
(ii)Any additional changes to accreditation information previously submitted to FDA under paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(3)Determining that a third-party certification body it accredited failed to comply with § 1.653 in issuing a food or facility certification under this subpart, and include:
(i)The basis for such determination; and
(ii)Any changes to accreditation information previously submitted to FDA under paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
(d)Other notification to FDA. A recognized accreditation body must notify FDA electronically, in English, within 30 days after:
(1)Denying accreditation (in whole or in part) under this subpart and include:
(i)The name, address, telephone number, and email address of the third-party certification body;
(ii)The name of one or more officers of the third-party certification body;
(iii)The scope of accreditation requested; and
(iv)The scope and basis for such denial.
(2)Making any significant change that would affect the manner in which it complies with the applicable requirements of this subpart and include:
(i)A description of the change; and
(ii)An explanation for the purpose of the change.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.