Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 20 — Employees' Benefits · Part 404 — Federal Old-Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance (1950- ) · § 404.2021

§ 404.2021. What is our order of preference in selecting a representative payee for you?

517 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t20/s§ 404.2021·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

As a guide in selecting a representative payee, we have established categories of preferred payees. These preferences are flexible. We will consider an individual's advance designee(s) (see § 404.2018) before we consider other potential representative payees in the categories of preferred payees listed in this section. When we select a representative payee, we will choose the designee of the beneficiary's highest priority, provided that the designee is willing and able to serve, is not prohibited from serving (see § 404.2022), and supports the best interest of the beneficiary (see § 404.2020). The preferences are:
(a)For beneficiaries 18 years old or older (except those described in paragraph
(b)of this section), our preference is—
(1)A legal guardian, spouse (or other relative) who has custody of the beneficiary or who demonstrates strong concern for the personal welfare of the beneficiary;
(2)A friend who has custody of the beneficiary or demonstrates strong concern for the personal welfare of the beneficiary;
(3)A public or nonprofit agency or institution having custody of the beneficiary;
(4)A private institution operated for profit and licensed under State law, which has custody of the beneficiary; and
(5)Persons other than above who are qualified to carry out the responsibilities of a payee and who are able and willing to serve as a payee for a beneficiary; e.g., members of community groups or organizations who volunteer to serve as payee for a beneficiary.
(b)For individuals who are disabled and who have a drug addiction or alcoholism condition our preference is—
(1)A community-based nonprofit social service agency which is licensed by the State, or bonded;
(2)A Federal, State, or local government agency whose mission is to carry out income maintenance, social service, or health care-related activities;
(3)A State or local government agency with fiduciary responsibilities;
(4)A designee of an agency (other than a Federal agency) referred to in paragraphs (b)(1), (2), and
(3)of this section, if appropriate; or
(5)A family member.
(c)For beneficiaries under age 18, our preference is—
(1)A natural or adoptive parent who has custody of the beneficiary, or a guardian;
(2)A natural or adoptive parent who does not have custody of the beneficiary, but is contributing toward the beneficiary's support and is demonstrating strong concern for the beneficiary's well being;
(3)A natural or adoptive parent who does not have custody of the beneficiary and is not contributing toward his or her support but is demonstrating strong concern for the beneficiary's well being;
(4)A relative or stepparent who has custody of the beneficiary;
(5)A relative who does not have custody of the beneficiary but is contributing toward the beneficiary's support and is demonstrating concern for the beneficiary's well being;
(6)A relative or close friend who does not have custody of the beneficiary but is demonstrating concern for the beneficiary's well being; and
(7)An authorized social agency or custodial institution. [47 FR 30472, July 14, 1982; 47 FR 32936, July 30, 1982, as amended at 69 FR 60232, Oct. 7, 2004; 85 FR 7664, Feb. 11, 2020]
Connections4 cite this
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 404.2021
What is our order of preference in selecting a representative payee for you?
Fed. Reg.×4
Cites 0Cited by 4 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.