§ 1532.1130. How does disqualification under the CAA or CWA differ from a Federal discretionary suspension or debarment action?
233 words·~1 min read·
/us/cfr/t2/s§ 1532.1130·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)CAA and CWA disqualifications are exclusions mandated by statute. In contrast, suspensions and debarments imposed under subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 or under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, are exclusions imposed at the discretion of Federal suspending or debarring officials. This means that if you are convicted of violating the CAA or CWA provisions described under § 1532.1105, ordinarily your name and that of the violating facility is placed into the EPLS before you receive a confirmation notice of the listing, or have the opportunity to discuss the disqualification with, or seek reinstatement from, the EPA.
(b)CAA or CWA disqualification applies to both the person convicted of the offense, and to the violating facility during performance of an award or covered transaction under the Federal procurement and nonprocurement suspension and debarment system. It is the EPA's policy to carry out CAA and CWA disqualifications in a manner which integrates the disqualifications into the Governmentwide suspension and debarment system. Whenever the EPA determines that the risk presented to Federal procurement and nonprocurement activities on the basis of the misconduct which gives rise to a person's CAA or CWA conviction exceeds the coverage afforded by mandatory disqualification, the EPA may use its discretionary authority to suspend or debar a person under subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, or under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4.
Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
- 2 CFR 180
- 48 CFR 9
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 1532.1130
How does disqualification under the CAA or CWA differ from a Federal discretionary suspension or debarment action?
Cite2 CFR 180
Cite48 CFR 9
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources