§ 354.6. Initiation of proceedings.
313 words·~1 min read·
/us/cfr/t19/s§ 354.6·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)In general. After an investigation and report by the director under § 354.5(c) and consultation with the Chief Counsel, the Deputy Under Secretary for International Trade will determine whether there is reasonable cause to believe that a person has violated an administrative protective order. If the Deputy Under Secretary for International Trade determines that there is reasonable cause, the Deputy Under Secretary for International Trade also will determine whether sanctions under paragraph
(b)or a warning under paragraph
(c)is appropriate for the violation.
(b)Sanctions. In determining under paragraph
(a)of this section whether sanctions are appropriate, and, if so, what sanctions to impose, the Deputy Under Secretary for International Trade will consider the nature of the violation, the resulting harm, and other relevant circumstances of the case. If the Deputy Under Secretary for International Trade determines that sanctions are appropriate, the Deputy Under Secretary for International Trade will initiate a proceeding under this part by issuing a charging letter under § 354.7. The Deputy Under Secretary for International Trade will determine whether to initiate a proceeding no later than 60 days after receiving a report of the investigation.
(c)Warning. If the Deputy Under Secretary for International Trade determines under paragraph
(a)of this section that a warning is appropriate, the Deputy Under Secretary will issue a warning letter to the person believed to have violated an administrative protective order. Sanctions are not appropriate and a warning is appropriate if:
(1)The person took due care;
(2)The Secretary has not previously charged the person with violating an administrative protective order;
(3)The violation did not result in any disclosure of the business proprietary information or the Secretary is otherwise able to determine that the violation caused no harm to the submitter of the information; and
(4)The person cooperated fully in the investigation. \[63 FR 24404, May 4, 1998\]