§ 212.05. Standards for awards.
151 words·~1 min read·
/us/cfr/t19/s§ 212.05·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)The determination whether an applicant is a prevailing party shall be made on a case-by-case basis.
(b)A prevailing applicant may receive an award for fees and expenses incurred in connection with an adversary adjudication, or in a significant and discrete substantive portion of the adversary adjudication, unless the position of the Commission investigative attorney was substantially justified. The burden of proof that an award should not be made to an eligible prevailing applicant is on the Commission investigative attorney. An award may be avoided by showing that the position of the Commission was reasonable in law and fact.
(c)An award will be reduced or denied if the applicant has unduly or unreasonably protracted the adversary adjudication or if special circumstances make the award sought unjust. The burden of proof that an award should be reduced or denied for either of these reasons is on the Commission investigative attorney.