Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 19 — Customs Duties · Part 207 — Investigations of Whether Injury to Domestic Industries Results from Imports Sold at Less Than Fair Value or from Subsidized Exports to the United States · § 207.51

§ 207.51. Judicial review of denial of application for disclosure of certain business proprietary information under administrative protective order.

174 words·~1 min read·/us/cfr/t19/s§ 207.51·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)In general. Persons entitled to judicial review under section 777(c)(2) of the Commission determination not to disclose business proprietary information may apply to the U.S. Court of International Trade for an order directing the Commission to make the information involved available.
(b)Transmittal of record. In the event a court order is sought under section 777(c)(2) requiring the Commission to disclose business proprietary information, the Secretary shall within 20 days after service of a summons and complaint upon the Commission transmit to the court under seal the business proprietary information involved along with pertinent parts of the record.
(c)Pertinent parts of the record. The pertinent parts of the record shall consist of:
(1)The application for Commission disclosure together with any documents filed in support thereof or in opposition thereto.
(2)Any Government memoranda relating to the Commission's determination, and
(3)The Commission's action on the application.
(d)Service of process. The Commission's General Counsel shall be the Commission's agent for service of process in cases under section 777(c)(2) of the Act.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.