Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 16 — Commercial Practices · Part 260 — Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims · § 260.11

§ 260.11. Ozone-safe and ozone-friendly claims.

140 words·~1 min read·/us/cfr/t16/s§ 260.11·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

It is deceptive to misrepresent, directly or by implication, that a product, package, or service is safe for, or friendly to, the ozone layer or the atmosphere. Example 1:A product is labeled "ozone-friendly." The claim is deceptive if the product contains any ozone-depleting substance, including those substances listed as Class I or Class II chemicals in Title VI of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Public Law. 101-549, and others subsequently designated by EPA as ozone-depleting substances.
These chemicals include chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), halons, carbon tetrachloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, methyl bromide, hydrobromofluorocarbons, and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs). Example 2:An aerosol air freshener is labeled "ozone-friendly." Some of the product's ingredients are volatile organic compounds
(VOCs)that may cause smog by contributing to ground-level ozone formation. The claim likely conveys that the product is safe for the atmosphere as a whole, and, therefore, is deceptive.
Connections3 cite this
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 101-549
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 260.11
Ozone-safe and ozone-friendly claims.
Fed. Reg.×3
Pub. L.Pub. L. 101-549
Cites 1Cited by 3 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.