Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 12 — Banks and Banking · Part 250 — Miscellaneous Interpretations · § 250.182

§ 250.182. Terms defining competitive effects of proposed mergers.

192 words·~1 min read·/us/cfr/t12/s§ 250.182·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Under the Bank Merger Act (12 U.S.C. 1828(c)), a Federal Banking agency receiving a merger application must request the views of the other two banking agencies and the Department of Justice on the competitive factors involved. Standard descriptive terms are used by the Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Comptroller of the Currency. The terms and their definitions are as follows:
(a)The term monopoly means that the proposed transaction must be disapproved in accordance with 12 U.S.C. 1828(c)(5)(A).
(b)The term substantially adverse means that the proposed transaction would have anticompetitive effects which preclude approval unless the anticompetitive effects are clearly outweighed in the public interest by the probable effect of the transaction in meeting the convenience and needs of the community to be served as specified in 12 U.S.C. 1828(c)(5)(B).
(c)The term adverse means that proposed transaction would have anticompetitive effects which would be material to the decision but which would not preclude approval.
(d)The term no significant effect means that the anticompetitive effects of the proposed transaction, if any, would not be material to the decision. (12 U.S.C. 1828(c)) [45 FR 45257, July 3, 1980]
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 250.182
Terms defining competitive effects of proposed mergers.
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.