Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 12 — Banks and Banking · Part 217 — Capital Adequacy of Bank Holding Companies, Savings and Loan Holding Companies, and State Member Banks (Regulation Q) · § 217.100

§ 217.100. Purpose, applicability, and principle of conservatism.

472 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t12/s§ 217.100·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Purpose. This subpart E establishes:
(1)Minimum qualifying criteria for Board-regulated institutions using institution-specific internal risk measurement and management processes for calculating risk-based capital requirements; and
(2)Methodologies for such Board-regulated institutions to calculate their total risk-weighted assets.
(b)Applicability.
(1)This subpart applies to:
(i)A top-tier bank holding company or savings and loan holding company domiciled in the United States that:
(A)Is not a consolidated subsidiary of another bank holding company or savings and loan holding company that uses this subpart to calculate its risk-based capital requirements; and
(B)That:
(1)Is identified as a global systemically important BHC pursuant to § 217.402;
(2)Is identified as a Category II banking organization pursuant to 12 CFR 252.5 or 12 CFR 238.10; or
(3)Has a subsidiary depository institution that is required, or has elected, to use 12 CFR part 3, subpart E (OCC), this subpart (Board), or 12 CFR part 324, subpart E (FDIC), to calculate its risk-based capital requirements;
(ii)A state member bank that:
(A)Is a subsidiary of a global systemically important BHC;
(B)Is a Category II Board-regulated institution;
(C)Is a subsidiary of a depository institution that uses 12 CFR part 3, subpart E (OCC), this subpart (Board), or 12 CFR part 324, subpart E (FDIC), to calculate its risk-based capital requirements; or
(D)Is a subsidiary of a bank holding company or savings and loan holding company that uses this subpart to calculate its risk-based capital requirements; or
(iii)Any Board-regulated institution that elects to use this subpart to calculate its risk-based capital requirements.
(2)A market risk Board-regulated institution must exclude from its calculation of risk-weighted assets under this subpart the risk-weighted asset amounts of all covered positions, as defined in subpart F of this part (except foreign exchange positions that are not trading positions, over-the-counter derivative positions, cleared transactions, and unsettled transactions).
(c)Principle of conservatism. Notwithstanding the requirements of this subpart, a Board-regulated institution may choose not to apply a provision of this subpart to one or more exposures provided that:
(1)The Board-regulated institution can demonstrate on an ongoing basis to the satisfaction of the Board that not applying the provision would, in all circumstances, unambiguously generate a risk-based capital requirement for each such exposure greater than that which would otherwise be required under this subpart;
(2)The Board-regulated institution appropriately manages the risk of each such exposure;
(3)The Board-regulated institution notifies the Board in writing prior to applying this principle to each such exposure; and
(4)The exposures to which the Board-regulated institution applies this principle are not, in the aggregate, material to the Board-regulated institution. [Reg. Q, 78 FR 62157, 62285, Oct. 11, 2013, as amended at 78 FR 62288, Oct. 11, 2013; 80 FR 41419, July 15, 2015; 84 FR 59271, Nov. 1, 2019]
Connections67 cite this · traces to 2
Cited by 67 sections · top 53
register
2 references not yet in our index
  • 12 CFR 3
  • 12 CFR 324
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 217.100
Purpose, applicability, and principle of conservatism.
Fed. Reg.×65
C.F.R.×2
Cite12 CFR 3
Cite12 CFR 324
Cites 4Cited by 67 across 2 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.