Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 10 — Energy · Part 963 — Yucca Mountain Site Suitability Guidelines · § 963.13

§ 963.13. Preclosure suitability evaluation method.

184 words·~1 min read·/us/cfr/t10/s§ 963.13·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)DOE will evaluate preclosure suitability using a preclosure safety evaluation method. DOE will evaluate the performance of the geologic repository at the Yucca Mountain site using the method described in paragraph
(b)of this section and the criteria in § 963.14. DOE will consider the performance of the system in terms of the criteria to evaluate whether the geologic repository is likely to comply with the applicable radiation protection standard.
(b)The preclosure safety evaluation method, using preliminary engineering specifications, will assess the adequacy of the repository facilities to perform their intended functions and prevent or mitigate the effects of postulated Category 1 and 2 event sequences. The preclosure safety evaluation will consider:
(1)A preliminary description of the site characteristics, the surface facilities and the underground operating facilities;
(2)A preliminary description of the design bases for the operating facilities and a preliminary description of any associated limits on operation;
(3)A preliminary description of potential hazards, event sequences, and their consequences; and
(4)A preliminary description of the structures, systems, components, equipment, and operator actions intended to mitigate or prevent accidents.
Connections1 cite this
Cited by 1 section
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 963.13
Preclosure suitability evaluation method.
Fed. Reg.×1
Cites 0Cited by 1 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.