Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTES-AT-LARGE · Vol. 6 STAT. · April 21, 1808 · Chapter XLIX

Chapter XLIX. for the relief of Matthew Smith and Darius Gates, jointly, and Darius Gates, separately

348 words·~2 min read·/statutes-at-large/vol-6/chapter-xlix-280094·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Chap. XLIX.— An Act for the relief of Matthew Smith and Darius Gates, jointly, and Darius Gates, separately. April 21, 1808. *Be it enacted, &c., * That the proper accounting officers of the treasury Joint account of Matthew Smith and Darius Gates to be settled.be, and they are hereby authorized to liquidate and settle the account of Matthew Smith and Darius Gates, and that they allow them the principal sum of money paid to the United States for two tracts of land lying in the town of East Haddam, in the State of Connecticut, purchased by the said Matthew Smith and Darius Gates, jointly, of the United States, through the marshal of the district of Connecticut, who was fully authorized to sell the same, and from which lands the said purchasers were regularly evicted by due course of law, together with the amount of costs by them expended in defending the titles of the United States to said lands, with interest on the whole sum that may appear to be due.
Sec. 2. Separate ac- count of Darius Gates to be settled. *And be it further enacted, *That the aforesaid accounting officers be, and they are hereby authorized to liquidate and settle the account of Darius Gates, and allow him the principal sum of money paid to the United States for two tracts of land lying in the aforesaid town TENTH CONGRESS. Sess. I. Ch. 54, 58. 1808. 73 and state, purchased by the said Darius Gates of the United States, through the marshal aforesaid, who was fully authorized to sell the same, and from which lands the said purchaser was evicted by due course of law, together with the amount of costs by him expended in defending the title of the United States to said lands, with interest on the whole sum that may appear to be due.
Sec. 3. *And be it further enacted, *That the sums which may beAppropriation. found due to the aforesaid purchasers of the lands aforesaid, be paid out of any moneys in the treasury, not otherwise appropriated. Approved, April 21, 1808.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.