Public Law 693. to supplement existing laws against unlawful restraints and monopolies, and for other purposes”, approved October 15, 1914, as amended (U
2,028 words·~9 min read·
/statutes-at-large/vol-49/public-law-693·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(/us/74/pl/692).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*,Antitrust Act of 1914, amendment.Vol. 38, p. 730.[U. S. C., p. 510](/us/usc/p510). That section 2 of the Act entitled “An Act to supplement existing laws against unlawful restraints and monopolies, and for other purposes”, approved October 15, 1914, as amended (U. S. C., title 15, sec. 13), is amended to read as follows: " “Sec. 2. Discriminations in price between different purchasers.
(a)That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality, where either or any of the purchases involved in such discrimination are in commerce, where such commodities are sold for use, consumption, or resale within the United States or any Territory thereof or the District of Columbia or any insular possession or other place under the jurisdiction of the Lessening, etc., competition.United States, and where the effect of such discrimination may be substantially to lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce, or to injure, destroy, or prevent competition with any person who either grants or knowingly receives the benefit *Provisos*.Differentials.of such discrimination, or with customers of either of them: *Provided*, That nothing herein contained shall prevent differentials which make only due allowance for differences in the cost of manufacture, sale, or delivery resulting from the differing methods or quantities in which such commodities are to such purchasers sold or Quantity limits.delivered: *Provided, however*, That the Federal Trade Commission may, after due investigation and hearing to all interested parties, fix and establish quantity limits, and revise the same as it finds necessary, as to particular commodities or classes of commodities, where it finds that available purchasers in greater quantities are so few as to render differentials on account thereof unjustly discriminatory or promotive of monopoly in any line of commerce; and the foregoing shall then not be construed to permit differentials based on differences in quantities greater than those so fixed and established: *And provided further*, Selection of customers.That nothing herein contained shall prevent persons engaged in selling goods, wares, or merchandise in commerce from selecting their own customers in bona fide transactions Price changes.and not in restraint of trade: *And provided further*, That nothing herein contained shall prevent price changes from time to time where in response to changing conditions affecting the market for or the marketability of the goods concerned, such as but not limited to actual or imminent deterioration of perishable goods, obsolescence of seasonal goods, distress sales under court process, or sales in good faith in discontinuance of business in the goods concerned. “(b) Hearing on complaint. Upon proof being made, at any hearing on a complaint under this section, that there has been discrimination in price or Burden of proof.services or facilities furnished, the burden of rebutting the primafacie case thus made by showing justification shall be upon the person charged with a violation of this section, and unless justification shall be affirmatively shown, the Commission is authorized to issue *Proviso*.Lower price made in good faith to meet competition.an order terminating the discrimination: *Provided, however*, That nothing herein contained shall prevent a seller rebutting the primafacie case thus made by showing that his lower price or the furnishing of services or facilities to any purchaser or purchasers was made in good faith to meet an equally low price of a competitor, or the services or facilities furnished by a competitor. 1527 “(c) That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged inBrokerage, etc., payments. commerce, in the course of such commerce, to pay or grant, or to receive or accept, anything of value as a commission, brokerage, or other compensation, or any allowance or discount in lieu thereof, exceptPayment for services rendered. for services rendered in connection with the sale or purchase of goods, wares, or merchandise, either to the other party to such transaction or to an agent, representative, or other intermediary therein where such intermediary is acting in fact for or in behalf, or is subject to the direct or indirect control, of any party to such transaction other than the person by whom such compensation is so granted or paid. “(d) That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged inDiscriminatory payments by seller to buyer for services, etc. commerce to pay or contract for the payment of anything of value to or for the benefit of a customer of such person in the course of such commerce as compensation or in consideration for any services or facilities furnished by or through such customer in connection with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of any products or commodities manufactured, sold, or offered for sale by such person, unless such payment or consideration is available on proportionally equal terms to all other customers competing in the distribution of such products or commodities. “(e) That it shall be unlawful for any person to discriminate inFurnishing services or facilities by seller to a buyer upon terms not accorded to all buyers. favor of one purchaser against another purchaser or purchasers of a commodity bought for resale, with or without processing, by contracting to furnish or furnishing, or by contributing to the furnishing of, any services or facilities connected with the processing, handling, sale, or offering for sale of such commodity so purchased upon terms not accorded to all purchasers on proportionally equal terms. “(f) That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged inInducing or receiving discrimination in price. commerce, in the course of such commerce, knowingly to induce or receive a discrimination in price which is prohibited by this section.” " Sec. 2. That nothing herein contained shall affect rights of actionPending litigation, etc.Vol. 38, p. 730. arising, or litigation pending, or orders of the Federal Trade Commission issued and in effect or pending on review, based on section 2 of said Act of October 15, 1914, prior to the effective date of this amendatory Act: *Provided*, That where, prior to the effective date*Proviso*.Pending orders of Federal Trade Commission. of this amendatory Act, the Federal Trade Commission has issued an order requiring any person to cease and desist from a violation of section 2 of said Act of October 15, 1914, and such order is pending on review or is in effect, either as issued or as affirmed or modified by a court of competent jurisdiction, and the Commission shallProceedings sphere violations committed. have reason to believe that such person has committed, used or carried on, since the effective date of this amendatory Act, or is committing, using or carrying on, any act, practice or method in violation of any of the provisions of said section 2 as amended by this Act, it may reopen such original proceeding and may issue and serve upon such person its complaint, supplementary to the original complaint, stating its charges in that respect. Thereupon the same proceedings shall be had upon such supplementary complaint as provided in section 11 of said Act of October 15, 1914. If upon such hearing the Commission shall be of the opinion that any act, practice, or method charged in said supplementary complaint has been committed, used, or carried on since the effective date of this amendatory Act, or is being committed, used or carried on, in violation of said section 2 as amended by this Act, it shall make a report inReport of findings. writing in which it shall state its findings as to the facts and shall issue and serve upon such person its order modifying or amending1528 its original order to include any additional violations of law so Review and enforcement of Commission’s orders.Vol. 38, p. 734; Vol. 48, p. 1102.found. Thereafter the provisions of section 11 of said Act of October 15, 1914, as to review and enforcement of orders of the Commission shall in all things apply to such modified or amended order. If upon review as provided in said section 11 the court shall set aside such modified or amended order, the original order shall not be affected thereby, but it shall be and remain in force and effect as fully and to the same extent as if such supplementary proceedings had not been taken. Sec. 3. Discounts, rebates, allowances, advertising service charges. It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to be a party to, or assist in, any transaction of sale, or contract to sell, which discriminates to his knowledge against competitors of the purchaser, in that, any discount, rebate, allowance, or advertising service charge is granted to the purchaser over and above any discount, rebate, allowance, or advertising service charge available at the time of such transaction to said competitors in respect of a sale of goods of like grade, quality, Sales, etc., at discriminatory prices to destroy competition.and quantity; to sell, or contract to sell, goods in any part of the United States at prices lower than those exacted by said person elsewhere in the United States for the purpose of destroying competition, or eliminating a competitor in such part of the United States; or, to sell, or contract to sell, goods at unreasonably low prices for the purpose of destroying competition or eliminating a competitor. Penalty for violation.Any person violating any of the provisions of this section shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. Sec. 4. Cooperative associations. Nothing in this Act shall prevent a cooperative association from returning to its members, producers, or consumers the whole, or any part of, the net earnings or surplus resulting from its trading operations, in proportion to their purchases or sales from, to, or through the association. Approved, June 19, 1936. To consolidate the Indian pueblos of Jemez and Pecos, New Mexico. 1936-06-19 49 Stat. 1528 593 Chapter 74 2 United States Government Publishing Office text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. Digitization Vendor 2025-01-07 public [CHAPTER 593.] AN ACT To consolidate the Indian pueblos of Jemez and Pecos, New Mexico. June 19, 1936.[[H. R. 12074](/us/bill/74/hr/12074).][[Public, No. 693](/us/74/pl/693).] *Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled*, Jemez and Pecos pueblos, N. Mex.Consolidation Into Pueblo de Jemez. That the Pueblo Indian tribes of New Mexico, commonly known and referred to as the Pueblo de Jemez and Pueblo de Pecos, be, and they are hereby, consolidated and merged into one tribe hereafter to be known as the Pueblo de Jemez. Sec. 2. Property, etc., held by either to be vested in consolidated tribe. That all property, real or personal, rights, titles, interests, claims, or demands of whatsoever kind or nature, now held or claimed by either of said tribes, or communities shall be, and hereby are, vested in the consolidated tribe. Sec. 3. Use of funds of either tribe. That the unexpended balance of any funds heretofore awarded to, appropriated for, or hereafter to be appropriated by Congress for the use or benefit of either of said tribes or pueblos referred to shall be held for and applied to the use and benefit of said consolidated and merged tribe or pueblo, known as Pueblo de Jemez, subject to all limitations or restrictions now applicable to said funds. Approved, June 19, 1936. To effectuate certain provisions of the International Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property as revised at The Hague on November 6, 1925. 1936-06-19 49 Stat. 1529 594 Chapter 74 2 United States Government Publishing Office text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. Digitization Vendor 2025-01-07 public 1529 [CHAPTER 594.] AN ACT To effectuate certain provisions of the International Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property as revised at The Hague on November 6, 1925. June 19, 1936.[[S. 1795](/us/bill/74/s/1795).][
Connectionstraces to 2
Traces to 2 documents
Citation graph
cites case law
Public Law 693
to supplement existing laws against unlawful restraints and monopolies, and for other purposes”, approved October 15, 1914, as amended (U
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources